Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26822039›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Camouflage predicts survival in ground-nesting birds.

Jolyon Troscianko, Jared Wilson-Aggarwal, Martin Stevens, Claire N Spottiswoode

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The role of cognition in nesting.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jolyon TrosciankoUniversity of Exeter, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life &Environmental Sciences, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK.
Jared Wilson-AggarwalUniversity of Exeter, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life &Environmental Sciences, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK.
Martin StevensUniversity of Exeter, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life &Environmental Sciences, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK.
Claire N SpottiswoodeUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G022887/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014109/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J018309/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evading detection by predators is crucial for survival. Camouflage is therefore a widespread adaptation, but despite substantial research effort our understanding of different camouflage strategies has relied predominantly on artificial systems and on experiments disregarding how camouflage is perceived by predators. Here we show for the first time in a natural system, that survival probability of wild animals is directly related to their level of camouflage as perceived by the visual systems of their main predators. Ground-nesting plovers and coursers flee as threats approach, and their clutches were more likely to survive when their egg contrast matched their surrounds. In nightjars - which remain motionless as threats approach - clutch survival depended on plumage pattern matching between the incubating bird and its surrounds. Our findings highlight the importance of pattern and luminance based camouflage properties, and the effectiveness of modern techniques in capturing the adaptive properties of visual phenotypes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological MimicryBirdsPredatory BehaviorAnimalsColorVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID26822039
PMCPMC4731810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.