Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26821574›Full record

ArticlemAbs2016

A comparison of the ability of the human IgG1 allotypes G1m3 and G1m1,17 to stimulate T-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors.

Carl I Webster, Christine J Bryson, Edward A Cloake, Tim D Jones, Mark J Austin, Anette C Karle, Sebastian Spindeldreher, David C Lowe, Matthew P Baker

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Identification of IgG1 and IgG3 Allotypes by PCR and Sanger Sequencing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Immunogenicity of biologic agents in rheumatology.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carl I Webstera MedImmune Ltd, Milstein Building , Granta Park, Cambridge , CB21 6GH , United Kingdom.
Christine J Brysonb Antitope Ltd (An Abzena company), Babraham Research Campus , Babraham, Cambridge , CB22 3AT , United Kingdom.
Edward A Cloakeb Antitope Ltd (An Abzena company), Babraham Research Campus , Babraham, Cambridge , CB22 3AT , United Kingdom.
Tim D Jonesb Antitope Ltd (An Abzena company), Babraham Research Campus , Babraham, Cambridge , CB22 3AT , United Kingdom.
Mark J Austina MedImmune Ltd, Milstein Building , Granta Park, Cambridge , CB21 6GH , United Kingdom.
Anette C Karlec Novartis Pharma AG , Klybeckstrasse 141, CH-4057 Basel , Switzerland.
Sebastian Spindeldreherc Novartis Pharma AG , Klybeckstrasse 141, CH-4057 Basel , Switzerland.
David C Lowea MedImmune Ltd, Milstein Building , Granta Park, Cambridge , CB21 6GH , United Kingdom.
Matthew P Bakerb Antitope Ltd (An Abzena company), Babraham Research Campus , Babraham, Cambridge , CB22 3AT , United Kingdom.
Abzena (United Kingdom) · GBNovartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunogenicity of clinically administered antibodies has clinical implications for the patients receiving them, ranging from mild consequences, such as increased clearance of the drug from the circulation, to life-threatening effects. The emergence of methods to engineer variable regions resulting in the generation of humanised and fully human antibodies as therapeutics has reduced the potential for adverse immunogenicity. However, due to differences in sequence referred to as allotypic variation, antibody constant regions are not homogeneous within the human population, even within sub-classes of the same immunoglobulin isotype. For therapeutically administered antibodies, the potential exists for an immune response from the patient to the antibody if the allotype of patient and antibody do not match. Allotypic distribution in the human population varies within and across ethnic groups making the choice of allotype for a therapeutic antibody difficult. This study investigated the potential of human IgG1 allotypes to stimulate responses in human CD4(+) T cells from donors matched for homologous and heterologous IgG1 allotypes. Allotypic variants of the therapeutic monoclonal antibody trastuzumab were administered to genetically defined allotypic matched and mismatched donor T cells. No significant responses were observed in the mismatched T cells. To investigate the lack of T-cell responses in relation to mismatched allotypes, HLA-DR agretopes were identified via MHC associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs). As expected, many HLA-DR restricted peptides were presented. However, there were no peptides presented from the sequence regions containing the allotypic variations. Taken together, the results from the T-cell assay and MAPPs assay indicate that the allotypic differences in human IgG1 do not represent a significant risk for induction of immunogenicity.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHLA-DR AntigensHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin Gm AllotypesHLA-DR AntigensImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin Gm AllotypesAllotypeEpitopeHLAIgGImmunogenicityMAPPsMHCT-cell

Identifiers

PMID26821574
PMCPMC4966604
OpenAlexW2277533373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.