Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26821536›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2016

Membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments.

Chia-Wei Lee, Lan-Ling Jang, Huei-Jyuan Pan, Yun-Ru Chen, Chih-Cheng Chen, Chau-Hwang Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chia-Wei LeeResearch Center for Applied Sciences, Academia Sinica, 128 Sec. 2, Academia Road, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. folly@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
Lan-Ling JangResearch Center for Applied Sciences, Academia Sinica, 128 Sec. 2, Academia Road, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. cutegirls520@hotmail.com.
Huei-Jyuan PanResearch Center for Applied Sciences, Academia Sinica, 128 Sec. 2, Academia Road, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. cathypanhj@hotmail.com.
Yun-Ru ChenGenomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. yrchen@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
Chih-Cheng ChenInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. chih@ibms.sinica.edu.tw.
Chau-Hwang LeeResearch Center for Applied Sciences, Academia Sinica, 128 Sec. 2, Academia Road, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. clee@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
Academia Sinica · TWGenomics Research Center, Academia Sinica · TWInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell membranes exhibit abundant types of responses to external stimulations. Intuitively, membrane topography should be sensitive to changes of physical or chemical factors in the microenvironment. We employed the non-interferometric wide-field optical profilometry (NIWOP) technique to quantify the membrane roughness of living neuroblastoma cells under various treatments that could change the mechanical properties of the cells.

resultsThe membrane roughness was reduced as the neuroblastoma cell was treated with paclitaxel, which increases cellular stiffness by translocating microtubules toward the cell membranes. The treatment of positively charged gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) showed a similar effect. In contrast, the negatively charged AuNPs did not cause significant changes of the membrane roughness. We also checked the membrane roughness of fixed cells by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confirmed that the membrane roughness could be regarded as a parameter reflecting cellular mechanical properties. Finally, we monitored the temporal variations of the membrane roughness under the treatment with a hypertonic solution (75 mM sucrose in the culture medium). The membrane roughness was increased within 1 h but returned to the original level after 2 h.

conclusionsThe results in the present study suggest that the optical measurement on membrane roughness can be regarded as a label-free method to monitor the changes in cell mechanical properties or binding properties of nanoparticles on cell surface. Because the cells were left untouched during the measurement, further tests about cell viability or drug efficacy can be done on the same specimen. Membrane roughness could thus provide a quick screening for new chemical or physical treatments on neuronal cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell MembraneGoldMetal NanoparticlesMiceMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNeuroblastomaNeuronsPaclitaxelSurface PropertiesGoldPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID26821536
PMCPMC4731942
OpenAlexW2267560160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.