Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26821035›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Smoke-Free Public Policies and Voluntary Policies in Personal Settings in Tbilisi, Georgia: A Qualitative Study.

Carla J Berg, Samantha A Smith, Ta Misha Bascombe, Nino Maglakelidze, Lela Starua, Marina Topuridze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carla J BergDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, NE, Room 524, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. cjberg@emory.edu.
Samantha A SmithHealth Promotion and Wellness Directorate Army Public Health Center, 8506 Dawnridge Dr., Houston, TX 77071, USA. s.smith012@gmail.com.
Ta Misha BascombeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. tsbascombe@gmail.com.
Nino MaglakelidzeNational Center for Disease Control, 9 M. Asatiani st. Tbilisi, GA 0177, USA. nmaglakelidze@yahoo.com.
Lela StaruaNational Center for Disease Control, 9 M. Asatiani st. Tbilisi, GA 0177, USA. lela.sturua@ncdc.ge.
Marina TopuridzeNational Center for Disease Control, 9 M. Asatiani st. Tbilisi, GA 0177, USA. topuridzemarina@gmail.com.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USEmory University · USU.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine · US

Funding

Development of a Tailored eHealth Smoking Intervention for Community CollegesK07CA139114 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BERG, CARLA J · 2010 to 2014
$640k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA139114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Georgia has limited tobacco control policies, particularly in the area of smoke-free public policies, which may influence the adoption of smoke-free home rules. We qualitatively examined knowledge about and reactions to public and personal smoke-free policies among Tbilisi residents. In Spring 2014, we conducted six focus groups among 47 total participants--two among male smokers, one among male nonsmokers, two among female smokers, and one among female nonsmokers. Our sample was 48.9% male and 70.2% past 30-day smokers. Most believed that SHS was dangerous, with particular concern regarding the impact of SHS on children and pregnant women. Many had misconceptions about how to protect others from SHS and the effectiveness of some approaches. Many indicated that they had some type of home rules, but few reported a complete ban on smoking in the home. Even when some restrictions were in place, they rarely were effective or enforced. Common concerns about the partial smoke-free public policy in Georgia included its economic impact, perceived discrimination among smokers, and the policy being against the Georgian culture. These concerns were heightened when participants were asked about the possible implementation of a complete smoke-free policy. Educational programs are needed to promote smoke-free policies in Georgia.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSmoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionAdultFemaleFocus GroupsGeorgia (Republic)HumansMalePublic PolicyQualitative ResearchSmokingYoung AdultTobacco Smoke Pollutionhealth disparitieshealth policysecondhand smoke exposuretobacco control

Identifiers

PMID26821035
PMCPMC4772176
OpenAlexW2270541545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.