Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26820718›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2016

Prevalence of laparoscopic surgical treatment and its clinical outcomes in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis in Japan.

Hideki Ueno, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Fumio Ishida, Tatsuro Yamaguchi, Takao Hinoi, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Yasuhiro Inoue, Naohiro Tomita, Nagahide Matsubara and 14 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Update on Surgical Management of FAP.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Hideki UenoDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan. ueno@ndmc.ac.jp.
Hirotoshi KobayashiCenter for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsuyoshi KonishiGastroenterological Center, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumio IshidaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Tatsuro YamaguchiDepartment of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takao HinoiDepartment of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yukihide KanemitsuDivision of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiro InoueDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
Naohiro TomitaDepartment of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Nagahide MatsubaraDepartment of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Koji KomoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Heita OzawaDepartment of Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Takeshi NagasakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Hirotoshi HasegawaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoi KoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Yoshito AkagiDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Toshimasa YatsuokaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Kensuke KumamotoDepartment of Organ Regulatory Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Kiyotaka KurachiDepartment of Surgery 2, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Kohji TanakayaDepartment of Surgery, Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Japan.
Kazuhiko YoshimatsuDepartment of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki WatanabeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi SugiharaTokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideyuki IshidaDepartment of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Hyogo Medical University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPFukushima Medical University · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPHirosaki University · JPHiroshima University · JPIwakuni Medical Center · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKeio University · JPKurume University · JPMie University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPOkayama University · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPSaitama Medical University · JPShowa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTochigi Cancer Center · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic surgery is becoming the preferred technique for most colorectal interventions. This study aimed to clarify the time trend of surgical treatment for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and its relevance to clinical outcomes in Japan over a 13-year period.

methodsThis was a multicenter retrospective cohort study comprising 23 specialist institutions for colorectal disease and a cohort of 282 FAP patients who underwent total colectomy or proctocolectomy during 2000-2012. Patient clinical backgrounds and surgical outcomes were compared between the first and second halves of the study period.

resultsThe proportion of surgical types adopted over the entire study period was 46, 21, 30, and 3 % for ileoanal anastomosis (IAA), ileoanal canal anastomosis, ileorectal anastomosis, and permanent ileostomy, respectively. FAP patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery have increased since 2008 and reached 74 % in the past 3 years. In particular, the number of patients undergoing laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IAA increased approximately four-fold from the first to the second half of the study period. A laparoscopic approach was increasingly used in patients with coexisting colorectal malignancies. Despite this trend, surgical results of the laparoscopic approach between the two study periods showed similar morbidity, pouch operation and stoma closure completion rates. No postoperative mortality was observed in this series, and laparoscopic surgery was comparable to open surgery in terms of stoma closure rate, incidence of intra-abdominal/abdominal desmoid tumors, and postoperative survival rate in both study periods.

conclusionLaparoscopic approach is increasingly being adopted for prophylactic FAP surgery in Japan and may provide clinically acceptable practical outcomes.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAdultAgedColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsDesmoid TumorsFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDesmoid tumorFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)Laparoscopic surgeryTotal colectomyTotal proctocolectomy

Identifiers

PMID26820718
OpenAlexW2255704491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.