Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26820659›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2016

[Postchemotherapy residual tumour resection in complex metastatic sites of advanced testicular germ cell tumours].

P Paffenholz, D Pfister, A Heidenreich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Limits of surgery in uro-oncology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P PaffenholzKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
D PfisterKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
A HeidenreichKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. axel.heidenreich@uk-koeln.de.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostchemotherapy residual tumour resection (PC-RTR) is an integral part of the multimodal therapy for advanced testicular germ cell tumours. Depending on the extent and localisation of the residual mass, PC-RTR may necessitate a multidisciplinary procedure (which should be planned preoperatively), to resolve even complex situations in an oncologically sound manner, with lower treatment-related morbidity The aim of article is to report on the interdisciplinary management of complex residual masses. PATIENTS AND

methodsOf a total of 162 patients who underwent PC-RTR, 24 (17.8 %) patients underwent, in addition to a bilateral postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (PC-RPLND), complex adjunctive resections including the abdominal aorta, the inferior vena cava, or the thoracic/lumbar spine, and the neighbouring vessels (n = 15). We performed a retrospective analysis of treatment-associated complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and of progression-free, cancer-specific and overall survival.

resultsMedian patient age was 24.5 (18-52) years. All patients had an intermediate or poor prognosis according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaboration Group (IGCCCG). Median tumour diameter at the time of surgery was 18.6 (9.0-35) cm. In 5 patients 1-2 metastatic lumbar vertebral bodies were completely resected, stabilised and replaced by means of a cage. In 6 patients resection of the abdominal aorta/inferior vena cava with vascular prosthesis replacement was required owing to infiltration. In 2 patients the common iliac artery or vein was resected and replaced. In addition, retrocrural lymph nodes had to be resected in 5 patients and 3 patients required adjunctive nephrectomy. In another 4 patients the Whipple procedure was required owing to infiltration into the pancreas and/or duodenum. The median operating time was 7.8 (6-15) h, the median blood loss was around 1,450 (900-3,400) ml, and 2 Clavien-Dindo grade IVa complications occurred. Pathohistology revealed teratoma/vital cancer in 16/24 patients and scarring/necrosis in 8 patients. After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 1 patient developed recurrent disease and 1 patient died of the disease.

conclusionsPostchemotherapy, a few patients with advanced nonseminomas (NS) need complex residual tumour resection in an interdisciplinary setting, with a good functional and oncological outcome. Even the involvement of vascular vertebral structures does not constitute a contraindication for complete resection.

Indexed as

Abdominal NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsAortic resectionChemotherapyInferior vena cava replacementRetroperitoneal lymphadenectomyTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID26820659
OpenAlexW2338997058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.