Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26820612›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2016

Pre-Visit Prioritization for complex patients with diabetes: Randomized trial design and implementation within an integrated health care system.

Richard W Grant, Connie S Uratsu, Karen R Estacio, Andrea Altschuler, Eileen Kim, Bruce Fireman, Alyce S Adams, Julie A Schmittdiel, Michele Heisler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02375932 (Pre-Visit Prioritization for Complex Primary Care Patients With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02375932 nacompletednot on this map

Pre-Visit Prioritization for Complex Primary Care Patients With Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2015 to 2017Enrolled146ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsPre-Visit Tool, Usual Care Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Richard W GrantDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States. Electronic address: Richard.W.Grant@KP.org.
Connie S UratsuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Karen R EstacioDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Andrea AltschulerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Eileen KimDepartment of Medicine, Oakland Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, United States.
Bruce FiremanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Alyce S AdamsDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Julie A SchmittdielDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Michele HeislerUniversity of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Funding

Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Pre-Visit Prioritization for Complex Primary Care Patients with DiabetesR01DK099108 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GRANT, RICHARD W · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK092926NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099108NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK099108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsDespite robust evidence to guide clinical care, most patients with diabetes do not meet all goals of risk factor control. Improved patient-provider communication during time-limited primary care visits may represent one strategy for improving diabetes care.

methodsWe designed a controlled, cluster-randomized, multi-site intervention (Pre-Visit Prioritization for Complex Patients with Diabetes) that enables patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes to identify their top priorities prior to a scheduled visit and sends these priorities to the primary care physician progress note in the electronic medical record. In this paper, we describe strategies to address challenges to implementing our health IT-based intervention study within a large health care system.

resultsThis study is being conducted in 30 primary care practices within a large integrated care delivery system in Northern California. Over a 12-week period (3/1/2015-6/6/2015), 146 primary care physicians consented to enroll in the study (90.1%) and approved contact with 2496 of their patients (97.6%). Implementation challenges included: (1) navigating research vs. quality improvement requirements; (2) addressing informed consent considerations; and (3) introducing a new clinical tool into a highly time-constrained workflow. Strategies for successfully initiating this study included engagement with institutional leaders, Institutional Review Board members, and clinical stakeholders at multiple stages both before and after notice of Federal funding; flexibility by the research team in study design; and strong support from institutional leadership for "self-learning health system" research.

conclusionsBy paying careful attention to identifying and collaborating with a wide range of key clinical stakeholders, we have shown that researchers embedded within a learning care system can successfully apply rigorous clinical trial methods to test new care innovations.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth PrioritiesPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedCaliforniaClinical ProtocolsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareDoctor–patient communicationHealth informatics interventionsPrimary careRandomized clinical trialTranslation into practiceType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID26820612
PMCPMC4818191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.