Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26820313›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Identifies a Recurrent Mutation in MCPH1 Associating with Hereditary Breast Cancer Susceptibility.

Tuomo Mantere, Robert Winqvist, Saila Kauppila, Mervi Grip, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Anna Tervasmäki, Katrin Rapakko, Katri Pylkäs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phosphorylation of MCPH1 isoforms during mitosis followed by isoform-specific degradation by APC/C-CDH1.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  11. Deleterious Mutations in DNA Repair GeneFrontiers in oncology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tuomo MantereLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit and Biocenter Oulu, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre NordLab Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Robert WinqvistLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit and Biocenter Oulu, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre NordLab Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Saila KauppilaDepartment of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Mervi GripDepartment of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Arja Jukkola-VuorinenDepartment of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Anna TervasmäkiLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit and Biocenter Oulu, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre NordLab Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Katrin RapakkoLaboratory of Genetics, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre NordLab Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Katri PylkäsLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit and Biocenter Oulu, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre NordLab Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
University of Oulu · FINordLab · FIOulu University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is strongly influenced by hereditary risk factors, a majority of which still remain unknown. Here, we performed a targeted next-generation sequencing of 796 genes implicated in DNA repair in 189 Finnish breast cancer cases with indication of hereditary disease susceptibility and focused the analysis on protein truncating mutations. A recurrent heterozygous mutation (c.904_916del, p.Arg304ValfsTer3) was identified in early DNA damage response gene, MCPH1, significantly associating with breast cancer susceptibility both in familial (5/145, 3.4%, P = 0.003, OR 8.3) and unselected cases (16/1150, 1.4%, P = 0.016, OR 3.3). A total of 21 mutation positive families were identified, of which one-third exhibited also brain tumors and/or sarcomas (P = 0.0007). Mutation carriers exhibited significant increase in genomic instability assessed by cytogenetic analysis for spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements in peripheral blood lymphocytes (P = 0.0007), suggesting an effect for MCPH1 haploinsufficiency on cancer susceptibility. Furthermore, 40% of the mutation carrier tumors exhibited loss of the wild-type allele. These findings collectively provide strong evidence for MCHP1 being a novel breast cancer susceptibility gene, which warrants further investigations in other populations.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAge of OnsetBreast NeoplasmsCell Cycle ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsFemaleGerm-Line MutationHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedNerve Tissue ProteinsPedigreeCell Cycle ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsMCPH1 protein, humanNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26820313
PMCPMC4731077
OpenAlexW2254254101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.