ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2016
The Influence of Cuff Width, Sex, and Race on Arterial Occlusion: Implications for Blood Flow Restriction Research.
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of combined blood flow restriction and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on skeletal muscle hypertrophy in adults: a systematic review and meta analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of blood flow restriction training on patients with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of blood flow restriction combined with high-load training on muscle strength and sports performance in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Pooled it
- The effects of lower limb ischaemic preconditioning: a systematic review.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of blood flow restriction training on bone metabolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Pooled it
- Chronic Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Improves Objective Physical Function: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Pooled it
- The addition of blood flow restriction to resistance exercise in individuals with knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of physical therapyPooled it
- Effects of a low-load multi-component training program with blood flow restriction versus the same program without blood flow restriction on muscle thickness and functional outcomes in physically inactive young adults: randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Trial
- The impact of acute blood-flow-restriction resistance exercise on somatosensory-evoked potentials in healthy adults.Experimental physiology · 2024Trial
- The Acute Impact of External Compression on Back Squat Performance in Competitive Athletes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Blood Flow Restriction Only Increases Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis with Exercise.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Acute neuromuscular and short-term recovery responses to low-load exercise with individualized blood flow restriction in elite male volleyball players.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Blood Flow Restriction Training in Hemodialysis Patients: Clinical Benefits, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2026Review
- Standardizing ischemic preconditioning research in applied exercise physiology.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Review
- Individual factors associated with arterial and limb occlusion pressure in blood flow restriction: a scoping review of predictors and measurement methods.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Pressure prescription in blood flow restriction training: evaluating the role of arterial occlusion pressure.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Limb composition: implications for the determination of arterial occlusion pressure.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Does exercising bilaterally require measuring bilaterally? Bilateral versus unilateral tourniquet cuff inflation during measurement of arterial occlusion pressure: considerations for blood flow restriction exercise.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Sex differences in brachial and superficial femoral artery occlusion pressure.Current research in physiology · 2026Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe main aim of this study was to examine differences in upper arm arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) between three different cuff widths and how individual characteristics influence this. Additional aims of the study were to investigate differences in AOP due to sex and race and to create regression equations that estimate AOP for each cuff width.
methodsTwo hundred and forty nine participants (males n = 102; females n = 147) visited the laboratory once for measurement of arm length, arm circumference, and resting brachial systolic (bSBP) and diastolic blood pressure (bDBP). Next, each cuff was applied to the upper arm and inflated until a Doppler probe placed at the radial artery no longer detected blood flow. The minimum inflation pressure that caused cessation of blood flow was determined to be the AOP.
resultsDifferences in AOP were observed between cuff widths (p < 0.001). The 5-cm-wide cuff required the greatest inflation pressure [145 (19) mmHg], followed by the 10 cm [123 (13) mmHg], and 12-cm-wide cuff [120 (12) mmHg]. A model encompassing arm circumference, bSBP, arm length, bDBP, and sex explained the most variance in AOP for each cuff (5 cm, R (2) = 0.651; 10 cm, R (2) = 0.570; 12 cm, R (2) = 0.557). However, arm circumference explained the most unique variance for each cuff. When separated by sex, males required greater pressures. Additionally, after controlling for sex, it was found that non-Hispanic Blacks required greater pressures compared with Whites. The regression equations for each cuff width are as follows: 5 cm (mmHg) = 2.926 (arm circumference) + 1.002 (bSBP) - 0.428 (arm length) + 0.213 (bDBP) + 12.668 (sex) - 68.493; 10 cm (mmHg) = 1.545 (arm circumference) + 0.722 (bSBP) - 0.235 (arm length) + 0.205 (bDBP) + 6.378 (sex) - 15.918; 12 cm (mmHg) = 1.393 (arm circumference) + 0.710 (bSBP) - 0.294 (arm length) + 0.164 (bDBP) + 6.419 (sex) - 8.752.
conclusionsThe AOP is dependent upon cuff width, highlighting the need for authors to report cuff width and consider the impact it has on restriction. Participant characteristics, especially arm circumference, should be considered when applying this blood flow restriction pressure. Lastly, both sex and race have an impact on AOP, although it is not presently known how meaningful this difference is.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.