Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26820288›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2016

Health-Related Quality of Life After Spine Surgery for Primary Bone Tumour.

Raphaële Charest-Morin, Nicolas Dea, Charles G Fisher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgery of the tumors of the spine.EFORT open reviews · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quality of life, pain, and psychological factors in patients undergoing surgery for primary tumors of the spine.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  6. Anti-CD47 antibody eliminates bone tumors in rats.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK fixation system in the treatment of spine tumors: a preliminary report.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raphaële Charest-MorinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, 1401 18e rue, Local B-2408, Quebec, Quebec, Canada, G1J 1Z4. Raphaele.charest-morin.1@ulaval.ca.
Nicolas DeaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12th Avenue North, Local 5110, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, J1H 5 N4. Nicolas.dea@usherbrooke.ca.
Charles G FisherDivision of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, The Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program at Vancouver Coastal Health, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, 6th Floor, 818 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 1M9. Charles.fisher@vch.ca.
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementTreatment of primary bone tumours (PBT) of the spine is complex, often involving numerous surgical and oncology disciplines. Surgical en bloc resection with oncologically appropriate margins is the modality of choice when treating malignant PBT. En bloc resection with wide or marginal margins appears to offer better local and systemic control of the disease. This type of surgical resection can also be considered when treating benign aggressive tumours such as aneurysmal bone cyst, giant cell tumour and osteoblastoma. Although these surgeries respect oncologic principles, significant morbidity and mortality are associated. Adverse event collection is highly variable in the literature and mostly from retrospective studies. Wound complication, neurologic deficit and significant blood loss are encountered with surgical resection of PBT of the mobile spine and especially, the sacrum. The adverse event profile of these surgeries is high even in experienced quaternary referral centres. Therefore, primary spinal tumour resection is best performed in experienced centre with adequate multidisciplinary support. Furthermore, prospective and systematic adverse event data collection should be developed to ensure accurate data. The impact of such extensive and potentially impairment producing procedures on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is another critically valuable piece of information in the era of shared treatment decision making. At the present time, there is paucity of published data regarding HRQOL following these surgeries. Nonetheless, in theory, it seems that health-related quality of life after surgery for PBT is acceptable given the curative intent of the treatment. However, a decision-making process should be tailored to each patient and his or her expectations. Comprehensive discussions should be held preoperatively with the patient, family and other related allied health professionals if the informed consent and decision-making process is to be optimal.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeHumansRecovery of FunctionSpinal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAdverse eventComplicationsEn bloc resectionFunctional outcomesMobile spineMorbidityMortalityPrimary bone tumourQuality of lifeSacrectomySacrumSpine

Identifiers

PMID26820288
OpenAlexW2266388176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.