Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26820255›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2016

Re-infection of the prion from the scrapie‑infected cell line SMB-S15 in three strains of mice, CD1, C57BL/6 and Balb/c.

Kang Xiao, Bao-Yun Zhang, Xiao-Mei Zhang, Jing Wang, Cao Chen, Li-Na Chen, Yan Lv, Qi Shi, Xiao-Ping Dong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kang XiaoState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases of Zhejiang University, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, P.R. China.
Bao-Yun ZhangState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases of Zhejiang University, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, P.R. China.
Xiao-Mei ZhangState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases of Zhejiang University, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, P.R. China.
Jing WangState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases of Zhejiang University, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, P.R. China.
Cao ChenState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases of Zhejiang University, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, P.R. China.
Li-Na ChenState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases of Zhejiang University, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, P.R. China.
Yan LvState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases of Zhejiang University, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, P.R. China.
Qi ShiState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases of Zhejiang University, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, P.R. China.
Xiao-Ping DongState Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases of Zhejiang University, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, P.R. China.
National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that the SMB-S15 cell line was originally established by cultures from the brains of mice affected by the Chandler scrapie strain, and this cell line may express PrPSc permanently. However, the infectivity of the S15-derived prions on experimental animals has not yet been well documented. In the present study, the cell lysates of SMB-S15 were intracerebrally inoculated into three different strains of mice, namely C57BL/6, Balb/c and CD1. Prion protein (PRNP) gene sequencing revealed the same encoded PrP proteins in the sequences of amino acids in the three strains of mice, in addition to a synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in CD1 mice. All infected mice developed typical experimental transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) approximately six months post-infection. The clinical features of three infected mice were comparable. The pathogenic characteristics, such as the electrophoretic and glycosylation profiles and proteinase K (PK) resistance of PrPSc molecules, as well as the neuropathological characteristics, such as spongiform vacuolation, PrPSc deposits in cortex regions, astrogliosis and activated microglia, were also similar in all three strains of infected mice. However, PrPSc deposits in the cerebellums of CD1 mice were significantly fewer, which was linked with the observation that lower numbers of CD1 mice presented cerebellum-associated symptoms. Successive inoculation of the individual strains of mice with brain homogenates from the infected mice also induced typical experimental scrapie. The data in the present study thus confirm that the prion agent in SMB-S15 cells causes stable infectivity in different types of mice with distinct phenotypes after long-term propagation in vitro. The present study also provides further scrapie rodent models, which may be used in further studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayCell LineDisease Models, AnimalGPI-Linked ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrion DiseasesPrion ProteinsPrionsScrapieGPI-Linked ProteinsPrion ProteinsPrionsPrnd protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID26820255
PMCPMC4771105
OpenAlexW2273406885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.