Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819814›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2016

Retinal nerve fiber layer reflectometry must consider directional reflectance.

Xiang-Run Huang, Robert W Knighton, William J Feuer, Jianzhong Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predicting perimetric defects from en face maps of retinal nerve fibre layer reflectance.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Targeted spectroscopy in the eye fundus.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluating glaucomatous abnormality in peripapillary optical coherence tomography enface visualisation of the retinal nerve fibre layer reflectance.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel Technique for Quantifying Retinal Nerve Fiber Bundle Abnormality in the Temporal Raphe.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiang-Run HuangBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Robert W KnightonBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
William J FeuerBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Jianzhong QiaoBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Funding

Shared Equipment ModuleP30EY014801 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Dmitry V Ivanov · 2004 to 2026
$12.2M
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Glaucoma: Optical Properties and Damage MechanismsR01EY019084 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUANG, XIANGRUN · 2008 to 2017
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014801NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies reveal that measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) reflectance provide more sensitive detection of glaucomatous damage than RNFL thickness, but most do not consider directional reflectance of the RNFL, an important source of variability. This study quantitatively compared RNFL directional reflectance, represented by an angular spread function (ASF), measured at different scattering angles, different wavelengths and different distances from the optic nerve head (ONH) and for bundles with different thicknesses (T). An ASF was characterized by its amplitude (A) and width (W). Internal reflectance of a bundle was expressed as A/T. The study found that A varied significantly with scattering angle and wavelength and that A/T was different among bundles but constant along the same bundle, indicating that the internal structure of axons may vary among bundles but does not change with distance. This study also found that W was larger near the ONH and at longer wavelengths, but did not depend on scattering angle or T. Because a 4.3° change in incident angle can change reflected intensity by a factor of 2.7, accounting for directional reflectance should improve the accuracy and reproducibility of RNFL reflectance measurements.

Indexed as

(170.3660) Light propagation in tissues(170.4470) Ophthalmology(170.4580) Optical diagnostics for medicine(170.6935) Tissue characterization

Identifiers

PMID26819814
PMCPMC4722906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.