Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819735›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2015

Retrospective investigation of combination therapy with clarithromycin and levofloxacin for pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex disease.

Hitoshi Shimomura, Airi Ono, Keiko Imanaka, Toru Majima, Hidenori Masuyama, Tsugumichi Sato, Takao Aoyama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Role of Clofazimine in Treatment ofFrontiers in medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hitoshi ShimomuraFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510 Japan.
Airi OnoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510 Japan.
Keiko ImanakaDepartment of Pharmacy, Chemotherapy Research Institute, Kaken Hospital, 6-1-14 Konodai, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-0827 Japan.
Toru MajimaDepartment of Respiratory medicine, Chemotherapy Research Institute, Kaken Hospital, 6-1-14 Konodai, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-0827 Japan.
Hidenori MasuyamaDepartment of Respiratory medicine, Chemotherapy Research Institute, Kaken Hospital, 6-1-14 Konodai, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-0827 Japan.
Tsugumichi SatoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510 Japan.
Takao AoyamaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510 Japan.
Tokyo University of Science · JPKaken Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoroquinolones are often used for the treatment of refractory Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease when the clinical efficacy of the recommended regimen, which includes clarithromycin (CAM), rifampicin (RFP), and ethambutol (EB), is insufficient. However, recent in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that fluoroquinolones decreased the antibacterial activity of CAM when they were administered in combination. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the influence of the combination of CAM and levofloxacin (LVFX) on clinical outcomes for pulmonary MAC disease patients.

methodsPulmonary MAC disease patients from 2010 to 2012 were divided into two groups, those who received LVFX together with CAM (LVFX group) and those who received CAM without LVFX (control group). The number of patients who showed improvement was evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the start of therapy based on bacteriological examination (culture and smear examination) and the bacilli negative conversion rate.

resultsThere were no significant differences between the LVFX group (n = 18, 64.5 ± 6.5 years old) and the control group (n = 57, 71.0 ± 7.0 years old) in terms of gender, age, etiologic agent, baseline culture examination score, concomitant medication, and dosage of each drug. The clinical outcomes in the LVFX group were inferior to those in the control group at all endpoints and observational periods, and we found a significant difference in the percent improvement of the smear examination by fluorescence microscopy method (38 % vs. 83 %) and the bacilli negative conversion rate (38 % vs. 79 %) at 3 months. Our study suggests that the combination of CAM and LVFX causes unfavorable clinical outcomes for pulmonary MAC disease treatment. There was no significant difference between both groups in terms of frequency of adverse events.

conclusionThe possibility that combined administration of CAM and LVFX causes unfavorable clinical outcomes for pulmonary MAC disease treatment was suggested.

Indexed as

Bacilli negative conversion rateClarithromycinClinical efficacyLevofloxacinMycobacterium avium complex

Identifiers

PMID26819735
PMCPMC4728750
OpenAlexW2157833368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.