Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819723›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2015

Adherence to changing from brand-name to generic atorvastatin in newly treated patients: a retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims.

Yasunari Mano, Shota Fukushima, Hisayuki Kuroda, Hiroyuki Ohshima, Yoshinori Kato, Kaori Ohuchi, Kayoko Maezawa, Yasuyuki Momose, Shunya Ikeda, Mariko Asahi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasunari ManoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
Shota FukushimaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
Hisayuki KurodaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
Hiroyuki OhshimaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
Yoshinori KatoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
Kaori OhuchiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
Kayoko MaezawaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
Yasuyuki MomoseDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
Shunya IkedaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
Mariko AsahiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi Japan.
International University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffect of statin therapy has been reported to be associated with patient's adherence. Atorvastatin was available in Japan as a brand-name product beginning in 2000. The first atorvastatin generics were introduced in Japan in November 2011. The objective of this study was to analyze whether changing from a brand-name atorvastatin to a generic product would affect patient adherence.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study that included adult patients who received newly prescribed brand-name atorvastatin between June 1, 2011 and May 31, 2012, using a health insurance claims database in Japan. Patients were classified by the presence or absence of changing to a generic during the 6 months from December 1, 2011 to May 31, 2012 (the index period). The first prescription date for the generic or brand product during the index period was defined as the index date. Adherence to therapy was assessed by the proportion of days covered (PDC) and persistence of treatment by time to discontinuation.

resultsThere were 135 patients changing to generic atorvastatin and 147 continuing with the brand-name product. There was no significant difference in decrease of PDC from pre- to post-index date between the changed cohort and continued cohort (-8.6% vs -10.3%, respectively; P = 0.443). After adjusting for baseline covariates, including adherence in pre-index date, no statistically significant differences were observed in the adjusted odds of adherence between the cohorts (adjusted odds ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.46-1.53). There was also no significant difference in persistence between two cohorts in the 180-day after post-index date. After analysis of a Cox proportional hazard regression model controlling for baseline covariates, including adherence in pre-index date, no statistically significant differences were observed for the hazard of non-persistence between the cohorts (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.60-1.53).

conclusionsChanging from a brand-name atorvastatin to generic product did not affect adherence for patients newly treated with atorvastatin.

Indexed as

AdherenceAtorvastatinClaim databaseCohort studyGeneric substitutionPersistenceProportion of days covered

Identifiers

PMID26819723
PMCPMC4728754
OpenAlexW2109622927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.