Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819596›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2016

3D-EAUS and MRI in the Activity of Anal Fistulas in Crohn's Disease.

Maria Eleonora Alabiso, Francesca Iasiello, Gianluca Pellino, Aniello Iacomino, Luca Roberto, Antonio Pinto, Gabriele Riegler, Francesco Selvaggi, Alfonso Reginelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoanal Ultrasound in Perianal Crohn's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pelvic floor dysfunctions: how to image patients?Japanese journal of radiology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Eleonora AlabisoDepartment of Radiology, Ascalesi Hospital, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Francesca IasielloDepartment of Internal and Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Gianluca PellinoUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurologic, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Second University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-6421
Aniello IacominoDepartment of Internal and Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Luca RobertoDepartment of Internal and Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Antonio PintoDepartment of Radiology, Cardarelli Hospital, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Gabriele RieglerUnit of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurologic, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Second University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Francesco SelvaggiUnit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurologic, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Second University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Alfonso ReginelliDepartment of Internal and Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim. This study aspires to assess the role of 3D-Endoanal Ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in preoperative evaluation of the primary tract and internal opening of perianal fistulas, of secondary extensions and abscess. Methods. During 2014, 51 Crohn's disease patients suspected for perianal fistula were enrolled. All patients underwent physical examination with both the methods and subsequent surgery. Results. In the evaluation of CD perianal fistulas, there are no significant differences between 3D-EAUS and MRI in the identification of abscess and secondary extension. Considering the location, 3D-EAUS was more accurate than MRI in the detection of intersphincteric fistulas (p value = 10(-6)); conversely, MRI was more accurate than 3D-EAUS in the detection of suprasphincteric fistulas (p value = 0.0327) and extrasphincteric fistulas (p  value = 4 ⊕ 10(-6)); there was no significant difference between MRI and 3D-EAUS in the detection of transsphincteric fistulas. Conclusions. Both 3D-EAUS and MRI have a crucial role in the evaluation and detection of CD perianal fistulas. 3D-EAUS was preferable to MRI in the detection of intersphincteric fistulas; conversely, in the evaluation of suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric fistulas the MRI was preferable to 3D-EAUS.

Identifiers

PMID26819596
PMCPMC4706885
OpenAlexW1834282931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.