Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819266›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2016

What Predicts an Advanced-Stage Diagnosis of Breast Cancer? Sorting Out the Influence of Method of Detection, Access to Care, and Biologic Factors.

Joseph Lipscomb, Steven T Fleming, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Gretchen Kimmick, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Cyllene R Morris, Kun Zhang, Robert A Smith, Roger T Anderson, Susan A Sabatino and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immigration and Social Factors, Tumor Stage, and Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer in Asian American and Hispanic Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of Urban Neighborhood Disadvantage on Late Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Virginia.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph LipscombDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. jlipsco@emory.edu.
Steven T FlemingDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky.
Amy Trentham-DietzUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.
Gretchen KimmickDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center and Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Xiao-Cheng WuEpidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Cyllene R MorrisCalifornia Cancer Registry, Institute for Population Health Improvement, UC Davis Health System, Sacramento, California.
Kun ZhangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Robert A SmithAmerican Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Roger T AndersonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, and UVA Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Susan A SabatinoDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study Group
Emory University · USAmerican Cancer Society · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USDuke Medical Center · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUC Davis Health · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Virginia · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · US

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP000251NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP000253NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP000258NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP000259NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP000260NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP000261NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP000264NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple studies have yielded important findings regarding the determinants of an advanced-stage diagnosis of breast cancer. We seek to advance this line of inquiry through a broadened conceptual framework and accompanying statistical modeling strategy that recognize the dual importance of access-to-care and biologic factors on stage.

methodsThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Breast and Prostate Cancer Data Quality and Patterns of Care Study yielded a seven-state, cancer registry-derived population-based sample of 9,142 women diagnosed with a first primary in situ or invasive breast cancer in 2004. The likelihood of advanced-stage cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer IIIB, IIIC, or IV) was investigated through multivariable regression modeling, with base-case analyses using the method of instrumental variables (IV) to detect and correct for possible selection bias. The robustness of base-case findings was examined through extensive sensitivity analyses.

resultsAdvanced-stage disease was negatively associated with detection by mammography (P < 0.001) and with age < 50 (P < 0.001), and positively related to black race (P = 0.07), not being privately insured [Medicaid (P = 0.01), Medicare (P = 0.04), uninsured (P = 0.07)], being single (P = 0.06), body mass index > 40 (P = 0.001), a HER2 type tumor (P < 0.001), and tumor grade not well differentiated (P < 0.001). This IV model detected and adjusted for significant selection effects associated with method of detection (P = 0.02). Sensitivity analyses generally supported these base-case results.

conclusionsThrough our comprehensive modeling strategy and sensitivity analyses, we provide new estimates of the magnitude and robustness of the determinants of advanced-stage breast cancer. IMPACT: Statistical approaches frequently used to address observational data biases in treatment-outcome studies can be applied similarly in analyses of the determinants of stage at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(4); 613-23. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID26819266
PMCPMC8638656
OpenAlexW2252500324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.