Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819255›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2016

Functional Differences Between Placental Micro- and Macrovascular Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells.

Ioana Solomon, Megan O'Reilly, Lavinia Ionescu, Rajesh S Alphonse, Saima Rajabali, Shumei Zhong, Arul Vadivel, W Chris Shelley, Mervin C Yoder, Bernard Thébaud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Kinetic analyses of vasculogenesis inform mechanistic studies.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioana SolomonDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Cardiovascular Research Center and Pulmonary Research Group, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Megan O'ReillyDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Cardiovascular Research Center and Pulmonary Research Group, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lavinia IonescuDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Cardiovascular Research Center and Pulmonary Research Group, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Rajesh S AlphonseDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Cardiovascular Research Center and Pulmonary Research Group, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Saima RajabaliDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Cardiovascular Research Center and Pulmonary Research Group, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Shumei ZhongOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Regenerative Medicine Program, Sprott Center for Stem Cell Research, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Arul VadivelOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Regenerative Medicine Program, Sprott Center for Stem Cell Research, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
W Chris ShelleyDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatrics Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Mervin C YoderDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatrics Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Bernard ThébaudOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Regenerative Medicine Program, Sprott Center for Stem Cell Research, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada bthebaud@ohri.ca.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in the development of the placental vasculature can lead to pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia. Currently, the cause of preeclampsia is unknown, and there are no specific prevention or treatment strategies. Further insight into the placental vasculature may aid in identifying causal factors. Endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs) are a subset of endothelial progenitor cells capable of self-renewal and de novo vessel formation in vitro. We hypothesized that ECFCs exist in the micro- and macrovasculature of the normal, term human placenta. Human placentas were collected from term pregnancies delivered by cesarean section (n = 16). Placental micro- and macrovasculature was collected from the maternal and fetal side of the placenta, respectively, and ECFCs were isolated and characterized. ECFCs were CD31(+), CD105(+), CD144(+), CD146(+), CD14(-), and CD45(-), took up 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethyl-indocarbocyanine perchlorate-labeled acetylated low-density lipoprotein, and bound Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1. In vitro, macrovascular ECFCs had a greater potential to generate high-proliferative colonies and formed more complex capillary-like networks on Matrigel compared with microvascular ECFCs. In contrast, in vivo assessment demonstrated that microvascular ECFCs had a greater potential to form vessels. Macrovascular ECFCs were of fetal origin, whereas microvascular ECFCs were of maternal origin. ECFCs exist in the micro- and macrovasculature of the normal, term human placenta. Although macrovascular ECFCs demonstrated greater vessel and colony-forming potency in vitro, this did not translate in vivo, where microvascular ECFCs exhibited a greater vessel-forming ability. These important findings contribute to the current understanding of normal placental vascular development and may aid in identifying factors involved in preeclampsia and other pregnancy complications.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAntigens, CDEndothelial CellsEndothelial Progenitor CellsFemaleFetal BloodHumansPlacentaPre-EclampsiaPregnancyStem CellsAntigens, CDAngiogenesisEndothelial progenitor cellPlacental vasculaturePreeclampsiaStem cell

Identifiers

PMID26819255
PMCPMC4807658
OpenAlexW2286250564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.