ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016
Letter regarding "MT1-MMP is not a good prognosticator of cancer survival: evidence from 11 studies" by Wu KP et al.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Various Roles of PEDF in Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Expression of MMP-14 and prognosis in digestive system carcinoma: a meta-analysis and databases validation.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With great interest, we carefully read a meta-analysis entitled "MT1-MMP is not a good prognosticator of cancer survival: evidence from 11 studies" in Tumor Biology (by Wu KP et al.), in which the investigators aimed to assess the association between MT1-MMP expression and prognosis of patients with various types of cancers by calculating the pooled hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI). They have reached an important conclusion that MT1-MMP overexpression indicated an unfavorable overall survival (OS) in cancers and the pooled HR (95 % CI) was 2.46 (95 % CI 1.75-3.47). In addition, subgroup analysis showed the HRs (95 % CI) were 3.73 (95 % CI 2.67-5.21) and 2.46 (95 % CI 1.69-3.59) for MT1-MMP in lung cancer and gastric cancer, respectively. Before these results can be accepted, we would like to address several concerns related to this meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.