Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819104›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Early nasogastric tube feeding in optimising treatment for hyperemesis gravidarum: the MOTHER randomised controlled trial (Maternal and Offspring outcomes after Treatment of HyperEmesis by Refeeding).

Iris J Grooten, Ben W Mol, Joris A M van der Post, Carrie Ris-Stalpers, Marjolein Kok, Joke M J Bais, Caroline J Bax, Johannes J Duvekot, Henk A Bremer, Martina M Porath and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy - What's new?Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Iris J GrootenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. i.j.grooten@amc.uva.nl.
Ben W MolThe Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Joris A M van der PostDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carrie Ris-StalpersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjolein KokDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joke M J BaisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Caroline J BaxDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU Medical Centre, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes J DuvekotDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk A BremerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.
Martina M PorathDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Wieteke M HeidemaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kitty W M BloemenkampDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hubertina C J ScheepersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maureen T M FranssenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Martijn A OudijkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa J RoseboomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rebecca C PainterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLLeiden University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMáxima Medisch Centrum · NLMedisch Centrum Alkmaar · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyperemesis gravidarum (HG), or intractable vomiting during pregnancy, is the single most frequent cause of hospital admission in early pregnancy. HG has a major impact on maternal quality of life and has repeatedly been associated with poor pregnancy outcome such as low birth weight. Currently, women with HG are admitted to hospital for intravenous fluid replacement, without receiving specific nutritional attention. Nasogastric tube feeding is sometimes used as last resort treatment. At present no randomised trials on dietary or rehydration interventions have been performed. Small observational studies indicate that enteral tube feeding may have the ability to effectively treat dehydration and malnutrition and alleviate nausea and vomiting symptoms. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of early enteral tube feeding in addition to standard care on nausea and vomiting symptoms and pregnancy outcomes in HG patients. METHODS/

designThe MOTHER trial is a multicentre open label randomised controlled trial ( www.studies-obsgyn.nl/mother ). Women ≥ 18 years hospitalised for HG between 5 + 0 and 19 + 6 weeks gestation are eligible for participation. After informed consent participants are randomly allocated to standard care with intravenous rehydration or early enteral tube feeding in addition to standard care. All women keep a weekly diary to record symptoms and dietary intake until 20 weeks gestation. The primary outcome will be neonatal birth weight. Secondary outcomes will be the 24-h Pregnancy Unique Quantification of Emesis and nausea score (PUQE-24), maternal weight gain, dietary intake, duration of hospital stay, number of readmissions, quality of life and side-effects. Also gestational age at birth, placental weight, umbilical cord plasma lipid concentration and neonatal morbidity will be evaluated. Analysis will be according to the intention to treat principle. DISCUSSION: With this trial we aim to clarify whether early enteral tube feeding is more effective in treating HG than intravenous rehydration alone and improves pregnancy outcome.

trial registrationTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR4197 . Date of registration: October 2(nd) 2013.

Indexed as

AdultBirth WeightClinical ProtocolsEatingEnteral NutritionFemaleFluid TherapyGestational AgeHumansHyperemesis GravidarumInfant, NewbornIntubation, GastrointestinalLength of StayNauseaPatient ReadmissionPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26819104
PMCPMC4730616
OpenAlexW2291567510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.