Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819102›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Long-term evaluation of the effect of hypofractionated high-energy proton treatment of benign meningiomas by means of (11)C-L-methionine positron emission tomography.

Mats Ryttlefors, Torsten Danfors, Francesco Latini, Anders Montelius, Erik Blomquist, Olafur Gudjonsson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Implications of the Harmonization of [Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of the [Molecular imaging and biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mats RyttleforsDepartment of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. Mats.Ryttlefors@Neuro.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-2873
Torsten DanforsDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Francesco LatiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anders MonteliusDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Medical Radiation Science, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erik BlomquistDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Clinical oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Olafur GudjonssonDepartment of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if (11)C-L-methionine PET is a useful tool in the evaluation of the long-term effect of proton beam treatment in patients with meningioma remnant.

methodsIncluded in the study were 19 patients (4 men, 15 women) with intracranial meningioma remnants who received hypofractionated high-energy proton beam treatment. Patients were examined with (11)C-L-methionine PET and MRI prior to treatment and after 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years. Temporal changes in methionine uptake ratio, meningioma volume, meningioma regrowth and clinical symptoms throughout the follow-up period were evaluated.

resultsIn 17 patients the tumour volume was unchanged throughout the follow-up. The methionine uptake ratio on PET decreased over the years in most patients. In two patients the tumour remnant showed progression on MRI. In these patients, prior to the volume increase on MRI, the methionine uptake ratio increased. One patient experienced transient clinical symptoms and showed radiological evidence of a radiation-induced reaction close to the irradiated field.

conclusionProton beam treatment is a safe and effective treatment for achieving long-term growth arrest in meningioma remnants. Follow-up with (11)C-L-methionine PET may be a valuable adjunct to, but not a replacement for, standard radiological follow-up.

Indexed as

Carbon RadioisotopesDose Fractionation, RadiationMethioninePositron-Emission TomographyAdultAftercareFemaleHumansMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedProton TherapyTreatment OutcomeCarbon RadioisotopesMethionine11C-L-MethionineMeningiomaPositron emission tomographyProton beam treatmentStereotactic irradiation

Identifiers

PMID26819102
OpenAlexW2306490617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.