Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819088›Full record

ArticleNeural development2016

Identification of molecular signatures specific for distinct cranial sensory ganglia in the developing chick.

Cedric Patthey, Harry Clifford, Wilfried Haerty, Chris P Ponting, Sebastian M Shimeld, Jo Begbie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Elp1 function in placode-derived neurons is critical for proper trigeminal ganglion development.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025
    Article
  3. Spatiotemporal distribution of neural crest cells in the common wall lizard Podarcis muralis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cedric PattheyDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. cedric.patthey@umu.se.
Harry CliffordDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. harry.clifford@cruk.cam.ac.uk.
Wilfried HaertyDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. wilfried.haerty@tgac.ac.uk.
Chris P PontingDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. chris.ponting@igmm.ed.ac.uk.
Sebastian M ShimeldDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. sebastian.shimeld@zoo.ox.ac.uk.
Jo BegbieDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. jo.begbie@dpag.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U137761446Medical Research Council MC_UU_12008/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12021/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cranial sensory ganglia represent populations of neurons with distinct functions, or sensory modalities. The production of individual ganglia from distinct neurogenic placodes with different developmental pathways provides a powerful model to investigate the acquisition of specific sensory modalities. To date there is a limited range of gene markers available to examine the molecular pathways underlying this process.

resultsTranscriptional profiles were generated for populations of differentiated neurons purified from distinct cranial sensory ganglia using microdissection in embryonic chicken followed by FAC-sorting and RNAseq. Whole transcriptome analysis confirmed the division into somato- versus viscerosensory neurons, with additional evidence for subdivision of the somatic class into general and special somatosensory neurons. Cross-comparison of distinct ganglia transcriptomes identified a total of 134 markers, 113 of which are novel, which can be used to distinguish trigeminal, vestibulo-acoustic and epibranchial neuronal populations. In situ hybridisation analysis provided validation for 20/26 tested markers, and showed related expression in the target region of the hindbrain in many cases.

conclusionsOne hundred thirty-four high-confidence markers have been identified for placode-derived cranial sensory ganglia which can now be used to address the acquisition of specific cranial sensory modalities.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsCell DifferentiationChick EmbryoCranial NervesGanglia, SensoryNeurons

Identifiers

PMID26819088
PMCPMC4730756
OpenAlexW2272098118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.