Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26819072›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2016

Oral propranolol combined with topical timolol for compound infantile hemangiomas: a retrospective study.

Jing Ge, Jiawei Zheng, Ling Zhang, Weien Yuan, Haiguang Zhao

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Update on infantile hemangioma.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Propranolol therapy for infantile hemangioma: our experience.Drug design, development and therapy · 2017
    Article
  13. Beta Blockers in the Treatment of Periocular Infantile Hemangiomas: A Review.Internal medicine review (Washington, D.C. : Online) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing GeDepartment of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, 200000, China.
Jiawei ZhengDepartment of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, 200000, China.
Ling ZhangDepartment of Oromaxillofacial Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, 200000, China.
Weien YuanSchool of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200000, China.
Haiguang ZhaoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, 200000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compound infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are problematic and usually require intervention. This retrospective study aimed to introduce a combined therapy of oral propranolol and topical timolol, and evaluate its efficacy and safety. Eighty-nine infants with compound IHs were treated with oral propranolol 2 mg/kg/day divided 2 times per day and timolol maleate 0.5% gel 3 times per day, for at least 3 months. Two observers evaluated the hemangioma independently at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9 months after the initiation of treatment. Changes in the hemangioma score values were evaluated using paired t test. Rebound growth and adverse effects were recorded. After treatment was completed, this combined therapy achieved clinical response in 100% of the patients (89/89). Significant positive effects were demonstrated at 1, 3, 6 months (p < 0.001), but not obvious after 6 months (p = 0.06). The response of IHs to the therapy was depending on the age at initial treatment. The average treatment duration was 6.48 (5.77-7.19) months. One patient (1.1%) relapsed after cessation of 6-month treatment, and 7 children (7.8%) developed side effects. Our study suggested that oral propranolol combined with topical timolol treatment is very effective and well-tolerated for compound IHs, which can be used as a first line treatment.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdministration, TopicalAftercareFemaleHemangiomaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePropranololRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsTime FactorsTimololPropranololTimolol

Identifiers

PMID26819072
PMCPMC4730155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.