Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26818756›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2016

Muscle focal vibration in healthy subjects: evaluation of the effects on upper limb motor performance measured using a robotic device.

Irene Aprile, Enrica Di Sipio, Marco Germanotta, Chiara Simbolotti, Luca Padua

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04087928 (Efficacy of Focal Muscular Vibration in the Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity in Subjects With Stroke Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04087928 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Focal Muscular Vibration in the Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity in Subjects With Stroke Outcomes: Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSRan2019 to 2019Enrolled28ConditionsStrokeArmsFMV_flex, FMV_ext
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene AprileDon Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Foundation, Piazzale Morandi 6, 20121, Milan, Italy. iaprile@dongnocchi.it.
Enrica Di SipioDon Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Foundation, Piazzale Morandi 6, 20121, Milan, Italy.
Marco GermanottaDon Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Foundation, Piazzale Morandi 6, 20121, Milan, Italy.
Chiara SimbolottiDon Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Foundation, Piazzale Morandi 6, 20121, Milan, Italy.
Luca PaduaDon Carlo Gnocchi Onlus Foundation, Piazzale Morandi 6, 20121, Milan, Italy.
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITNeuroscience Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMuscle vibration is a technique that applies a low-amplitude/high-frequency vibratory stimulus to a specific muscle using a mechanical device. The aim of this study was to evaluate, using robot-based outcomes, the effects of focal muscle vibration, at different frequencies, on the motor performance of the upper limb in healthy subjects.

methodsForty-eight volunteer healthy subjects (age: 31 ± 8 years) were enrolled. Subjects were assigned to three different groups: the first group, in which subjects underwent muscle vibration treatment with a frequency of 100 Hz; the second group of subjects underwent the same treatment protocol, but using a frequency of vibration of 200 Hz; finally, the control group did not undergo any treatment. The robot-based evaluation session consisted of visually guided reaching task, performed in the sagittal plane.

resultsOur results showed that the vibration treatment improved upper limb motor performance of healthy subjects from the baseline (T0) to 10 days after the end of the treatment (T2), but only the group treated with a frequency of 200 Hz reached statistical significance. Specifically, in this group we found an increase of the number of repetitions (T0: 51.4 ± 22.7; T2: 66.3 ± 11.8), and the smoothness of the movement, as showed by a decrease of the Normalized Jerk (T0: 10.5 ± 2.8; T2: 7.7 ± 0.5).

conclusionThe results of our study support the use of focal muscle vibration protocols in healthy subjects, to improve motor performance.

Indexed as

MovementAdultFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRoboticsUpper ExtremityVibrationHealthy subjectsMuscle focal vibrationReaching taskRobot-mediated evaluation

Identifiers

PMID26818756
OpenAlexW2253237283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.