Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2016
Muscle focal vibration in healthy subjects: evaluation of the effects on upper limb motor performance measured using a robotic device.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04087928 (Efficacy of Focal Muscular Vibration in the Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity in Subjects With Stroke Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Focal Muscular Vibration in the Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity in Subjects With Stroke Outcomes: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Focal Muscle Vibration on Static and Dynamic Balance in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Preliminary Results of a Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Optimized Sensorimotor Activation Enhances the Control of Goal-Directed Aiming Mediated by Real-Time Visuomotor Transformations.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Immediate Effects of Focal Muscle Vibration on Squat Power and Velocity in Amateur Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Plastic changes induced by muscle focal vibration: A possible mechanism for long-term motor improvements.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Effects of different vibration frequencies on spinal cord reflex circuits and thermoalgesic perception.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2021Article
- Is the Focal Muscle Vibration an Effective Motor Conditioning Intervention? A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2021Review
- Sensory inflow manipulation induces learning-like phenomena in motor behavior.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
- Acute and chronic neuromuscular adaptations to local vibration training.European journal of applied physiology · 2017Review
- Efficacy of focal mechanic vibration treatment on balance in Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A disease: a pilot study.Journal of neurology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMuscle vibration is a technique that applies a low-amplitude/high-frequency vibratory stimulus to a specific muscle using a mechanical device. The aim of this study was to evaluate, using robot-based outcomes, the effects of focal muscle vibration, at different frequencies, on the motor performance of the upper limb in healthy subjects.
methodsForty-eight volunteer healthy subjects (age: 31 ± 8 years) were enrolled. Subjects were assigned to three different groups: the first group, in which subjects underwent muscle vibration treatment with a frequency of 100 Hz; the second group of subjects underwent the same treatment protocol, but using a frequency of vibration of 200 Hz; finally, the control group did not undergo any treatment. The robot-based evaluation session consisted of visually guided reaching task, performed in the sagittal plane.
resultsOur results showed that the vibration treatment improved upper limb motor performance of healthy subjects from the baseline (T0) to 10 days after the end of the treatment (T2), but only the group treated with a frequency of 200 Hz reached statistical significance. Specifically, in this group we found an increase of the number of repetitions (T0: 51.4 ± 22.7; T2: 66.3 ± 11.8), and the smoothness of the movement, as showed by a decrease of the Normalized Jerk (T0: 10.5 ± 2.8; T2: 7.7 ± 0.5).
conclusionThe results of our study support the use of focal muscle vibration protocols in healthy subjects, to improve motor performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.