Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26818674›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Development and Validation of an Improved PCR Method Using the 23S-5S Intergenic Spacer for Detection of Rickettsiae in Dermacentor variabilis Ticks and Tissue Samples from Humans and Laboratory Animals.

Madhavi L Kakumanu, Loganathan Ponnusamy, Haley T Sutton, Steven R Meshnick, William L Nicholson, Charles S Apperson

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Madhavi L KakumanuDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Loganathan PonnusamyDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Haley T SuttonDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Steven R MeshnickDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
William L NicholsonRickettsial Zoonoses Branch, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Charles S AppersonDepartment of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA Comparative Medicine Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA apperson@ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Preventing Exposure to Ticks and Tick-Borne Illness in Outdoor WorkersR01OH009874 · OH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MESHNICK, STEVEN RICHARD · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NIOSH CDC HHS 5R01OH009874NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH009874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel nested PCR assay was developed to detectRickettsiaspp. in ticks and tissue samples from humans and laboratory animals. Primers were designed for the nested run to amplify a variable region of the 23S-5S intergenic spacer (IGS) ofRickettsiaspp. The newly designed primers were evaluated using genomic DNA from 11Rickettsiaspecies belonging to the spotted fever, typhus, and ancestral groups and, in parallel, compared to otherRickettsia-specific PCR targets (ompA,gltA, and the 17-kDa protein gene). The new 23S-5S IGS nested PCR assay amplified all 11Rickettsiaspp., but the assays employing other PCR targets did not. The novel nested assay was sensitive enough to detect one copy of a cloned 23S-5S IGS fragment from "CandidatusRickettsia amblyommii." Subsequently, the detection efficiency of the 23S-5S IGS nested assay was compared to those of the other three assays using genomic DNA extracted from 40 adultDermacentor variabilisticks. The nested 23S-5S IGS assay detectedRickettsiaDNA in 45% of the ticks, while the amplification rates of the other three assays ranged between 5 and 20%. The novel PCR assay was validated using clinical samples from humans and laboratory animals that were known to be infected with pathogenic species ofRickettsia The nested 23S-5S IGS PCR assay was coupled with reverse line blot hybridization with species-specific probes for high-throughput detection and simultaneous identification of the species ofRickettsiain the ticks. "CandidatusRickettsia amblyommii,"R. montanensis,R. felis, andR. belliiwere frequently identified species, along with some potentially novelRickettsiastrains that were closely related toR. belliiandR. conorii.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryDermacentorDNA, IntergenicDNA PrimersHumansNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide ProbesPolymerase Chain ReactionRickettsiaceae InfectionsRickettsieaeRNA, Ribosomal, 23SRNA, Ribosomal, 5SSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, IntergenicDNA PrimersOligonucleotide ProbesRNA, Ribosomal, 23SRNA, Ribosomal, 5S

Identifiers

PMID26818674
PMCPMC4809929
OpenAlexW2287378307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.