Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26818669›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections in Children.

Jennifer Dien Bard, Erin McElvania TeKippe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Factors associated with persistent bloodstream infection in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Situation and questions regarding the practice of blood cultures in paediatric patients: an opinion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A European survey on anaerobes from paediatric blood cultures: a comparative analysis with adults.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Time to positive blood cultures in neonatal sepsis evaluations.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Dien BardDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Erin McElvania TeKippeDepartments of Pathology and Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA erin.mcelvania@childrens.com.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of bloodstream infections is among the most critical tasks performed by the clinical microbiology laboratory. While the criteria for achieving an adequate blood culture specimen in adults have been well described, there is much more ambiguity in pediatric populations. This minireview focuses on the available pediatric literature pertaining to the collection of an optimal blood culture specimen, including timing, volume, and bottle selection, as well as rapid diagnostic approaches and their role in the management of pediatric bloodstream infections.

Indexed as

Blood CultureBlood Specimen CollectionChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantSepsis

Identifiers

PMID26818669
PMCPMC4879304
OpenAlexW2286952948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.