Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26818594›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

Inference of domain-disease associations from domain-protein, protein-disease and disease-disease relationships.

Wangshu Zhang, Marcelo P Coba, Fengzhu Sun

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wangshu ZhangMolecular and Computational Biology Program, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, USA. wangshuz@usc.edu.
Marcelo P CobaZilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. coba@usc.edu.
Fengzhu SunMolecular and Computational Biology Program, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, USA. fsun@usc.edu.

Funding

MAPGen Knowledge Base (MAPGenKB) and Coordination CenterU01HL108634 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CRANDALL, EDWARD DAVID, ZHOU, XIANGHONG JASMINE · 2011 to 2015
$5.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL108634NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL108634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein domains can be viewed as portable units of biological function that defines the functional properties of proteins. Therefore, if a protein is associated with a disease, protein domains might also be associated and define disease endophenotypes. However, knowledge about such domain-disease relationships is rarely available. Thus, identification of domains associated with human diseases would greatly improve our understanding of the mechanism of human complex diseases and further improve the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.

methodsBased on phenotypic similarities among diseases, we first group diseases into overlapping modules. We then develop a framework to infer associations between domains and diseases through known relationships between diseases and modules, domains and proteins, as well as proteins and disease modules. Different methods including Association, Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), Domain-disease pair exclusion analysis (DPEA), Bayesian, and Parsimonious explanation (PE) approaches are developed to predict domain-disease associations.

resultsWe demonstrate the effectiveness of all the five approaches via a series of validation experiments, and show the robustness of the MLE, Bayesian and PE approaches to the involved parameters. We also study the effects of disease modularization in inferring novel domain-disease associations. Through validation, the AUC (Area Under the operating characteristic Curve) scores for Bayesian, MLE, DPEA, PE, and Association approaches are 0.86, 0.84, 0.83, 0.83 and 0.79, respectively, indicating the usefulness of these approaches for predicting domain-disease relationships. Finally, we choose the Bayesian approach to infer domains associated with two common diseases, Crohn's disease and type 2 diabetes.

conclusionsThe Bayesian approach has the best performance for the inference of domain-disease relationships. The predicted landscape between domains and diseases provides a more detailed view about the disease mechanisms.

Indexed as

Protein DomainsArea Under CurveBayes TheoremCrohn DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DiseaseGenetic Association StudiesLikelihood FunctionsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID26818594
PMCPMC4895779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.