ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
The diagnostic application of RNA sequencing in patients with thyroid cancer: an analysis of 851 variants and 133 fusions in 524 genes.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Variants and Their Risks for Malignancy in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2019Pooled it
- Comparative analysis of diagnostic performance, feasibility and cost of different test-methods for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- Risk of malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules harboring thyroid stimulating hormone receptor mutations.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Review
- Molecular markers for the classification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020Review
- Extending expressed RNA genomics from surgical decision making for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules to targeting therapies for metastatic thyroid cancer.Cancer cytopathology · 2019Article
- Analytical and Clinical Validation of Expressed Variants and Fusions From the Whole Transcriptome of Thyroid FNA Samples.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Article
- Thyroid cancers of follicular origin in a genomic light: in-depth overview of common and unique molecular marker candidates.Molecular cancer · 2018Review
- Identification of a Recurrent LMO7-BRAF Fusion in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2018Article
- Thyroid follicular adenomas and carcinomas: molecular profiling provides evidence for a continuous evolution.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Comprehensive analyses of somatic TP53 mutation in tumors with variable mutant allele frequency.Scientific data · 2017Article
- Molecular profiling of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2017Review
- Molecular Profiling of Thyroid Nodules: Current Role for the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier on Clinical Decision Making.Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2017Article
- A Genomic Alternative to Identify Medullary Thyroid Cancer Preoperatively in Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThyroid carcinomas are known to harbor oncogenic driver mutations and advances in sequencing technology now allow the detection of these in fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNA). Recent work by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network has expanded the number of genetic alterations detected in papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC). We sought to investigate the prevalence of these and other genetic alterations in diverse subtypes of thyroid nodules beyond PTC, including a variety of samples with benign histopathology. This is the first clinical evaluation of a large panel of TCGA-reported genomic alterations in thyroid FNAs.
resultsIn FNAs, genetic alterations were detected in 19/44 malignant samples (43% sensitivity) and in 7/44 histopathology benign samples (84% specificity). Overall, after adding a cohort of tissue samples, 38/76 (50%) of histopathology malignant samples were found to harbor a genetic alteration, while 15/75 (20%) of benign samples were also mutated. The most frequently mutated malignant subtypes were medullary thyroid carcinoma (9/12, 75%) and PTC (14/30, 47%). Additionally, follicular adenoma, a benign subtype of thyroid neoplasm, was also found to harbor mutations (12/29, 41%). Frequently mutated genes in malignant samples included BRAF (20/76, 26%) and RAS (9/76, 12%). Of the TSHR variants detected, (6/7, 86%) were in benign nodules. In a direct comparison of the same FNA also tested by an RNA-based gene expression classifier (GEC), the sensitivity of genetic alterations alone was 42%, compared to the 91% sensitivity achieved by the GEC. The specificity based only on genetic alterations was 84%, compared to 77% specificity with the GEC.
conclusionsWhile the genomic landscape of all thyroid neoplasm subtypes will inevitably be elucidated, caution should be used in the early adoption of published mutations as the sole predictor of malignancy in thyroid. The largest set of such mutations known to date detects only a portion of thyroid carcinomas in preoperative FNAs in our cohort and thus is not sufficient to rule out cancer. Due to the finding that variants are also found in benign nodules, testing only GEC suspicious nodules may be helpful in avoiding false positives and altering the extent of treatment when selected mutations are found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.