Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26818510›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Neuronal Modulation in the Prefrontal Cortex in a Transitive Inference Task: Evidence of Neuronal Correlates of Mental Schema Management.

Emiliano Brunamonti, Valentina Mione, Fabio Di Bello, Pierpaolo Pani, Aldo Genovesio, Stefano Ferraina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) rank lists using multiple cognitive mechanisms simultaneously.Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emiliano BrunamontiDepartment Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Valentina MioneDepartment Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Fabio Di BelloDepartment Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Pierpaolo PaniDepartment Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Aldo GenovesioDepartment Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Stefano FerrainaDepartment Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy stefano.ferraina@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6100-2438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When informed that A > B and B > C, humans and other animals can easily conclude that A > C. This remarkable trait of advanced animals, which allows them to manipulate knowledge flexibly to infer logical relations, has only recently garnered interest in mainstream neuroscience. How the brain controls these logical processes remains an unanswered question that has been merely superficially addressed in neuroimaging and lesion studies, which are unable to identify the underlying neuronal computations. We observed that the activation pattern of neurons in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) during pair comparisons in a highly demanding transitive inference task fully supports the behavioral performance of the two monkeys that we tested. Our results indicate that the PFC contributes to the construction and use of a mental schema to represent premises. This evidence provides a novel framework for understanding the function of various areas of brain in logic processes and impairments to them in degenerative, traumatic, and psychiatric pathologies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In cognitive neuroscience, it is unknown how information that leads to inferential deductions are encoded and manipulated at the neuronal level. We addressed this question by recording single-unit activity from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of monkeys that were performing a transitive inference (TI) task. The TI required one to choose the higher ranked of two items, based on previous, indirect experience. Our results demonstrated that single-neuron activity supports the construction of an abstract, mental schema of ordered items in solving the task and that this representation is independent of the reward value that is experienced for the single items. These findings identify the neural substrates of abstract mental representations that support inferential thinking.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsEye MovementsLearningMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsPhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexProblem SolvingPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeROC CurveStatistics, Nonparametricmonkeyprefrontal cortexsingle-unit activitytransitive inference

Identifiers

PMID26818510
PMCPMC6604826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.