ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016
Why Don't We Move Slower? The Value of Time in the Neural Control of Action.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Rapid dopaminergic signatures in movement: Reach vigor reflects reward prediction error and learned expectation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Rapid Dopaminergic Signatures in Movement: Reach Vigor Reflects Reward Prediction Error and Learned Expectation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Disentangling the effects of metabolic cost and accuracy on movement speed.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Reoptimization of single-joint motor patterns to non-Earth gravity torques induced by a robotic exoskeleton.iScience · 2023Article
- The value of time in the invigoration of human movements when interacting with a robotic exoskeleton.Science advances · 2023Article
- Continuous evaluation of cost-to-go for flexible reaching control and online decisions.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- From Motivation to Action: Action Cost Better Predicts Changes in Premovement Beta-Band Activity than Speed.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Visual search for reach targets in actionable space is influenced by movement costs imposed by obstacles.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- A Trade-Off between Complexity and Interaction Quality for Upper Limb Exoskeleton Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Understanding voluntary human movement variability through data-driven segmentation and clustering.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- The Cost of Imagined Actions in a Reward-Valuation Task.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Human Stiffness Perception and Learning in Interacting With Compliant Environments.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- How movements shape the perception of time.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021Review
- Single caudate neurons encode temporally discounted value for formulating motivation for action.eLife · 2021Article
- Reinforcement learning control of a biomechanical model of the upper extremity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Stochastic optimal feedforward-feedback control determines timing and variability of arm movements with or without vision.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Forward Inverse Relaxation Model Incorporating Movement Duration Optimization.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Dissociating the Impact of Movement Time and Energy Costs on Decision-Making and Action Initiation in Humans.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- A feedback information-theoretic transmission scheme (FITTS) for modeling trajectory variability in aimed movements.Biological cybernetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To want something now rather than later is a common attitude that reflects the brain's tendency to value the passage of time. Because the time taken to accomplish an action inevitably delays task achievement and reward acquisition, this idea was ported to neural movement control within the "cost of time" theory. This theory provides a normative framework to account for the underpinnings of movement time formation within the brain and the origin of a self-selected pace in human and animal motion. Then, how does the brain exactly value time in the control of action? To tackle this issue, we used an inverse optimal control approach and developed a general methodology allowing to squarely sample infinitesimal values of the time cost from experimental motion data. The cost of time underlying saccades was found to have a concave growth, thereby confirming previous results on hyperbolic reward discounting, yet without making any prior assumption about this hypothetical nature. For self-paced reaching, however, movement time was primarily valued according to a striking sigmoidal shape; its rate of change consistently presented a steep rise before a maximum was reached and a slower decay was observed. Theoretical properties of uniqueness and robustness of the inferred time cost were established for the class of problems under investigation, thus reinforcing the significance of the present findings. These results may offer a unique opportunity to uncover how the brain values the passage of time in healthy and pathological motor control and shed new light on the processes underlying action invigoration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Movement time is a fundamental characteristic of neural motor control, but the principles underlying its formation remain little known. This work addresses that question within the inverse optimal control framework where the challenge is to uncover what optimality criterion underlies a system's behavior. Here we rely on the "cost of time" theory that finds its roots into the brain's tendency to discount the actual value of future reward. It asserts that the time elapsed until action completion entails a cost, thereby making slow moves nonoptimal. By means of a thorough theoretical analysis, the present article shows how to sample the infinitesimal values of the time cost without prior assumption about its hypothetical nature and emphasizes its sigmoidal shape for reaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.