Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26818370›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2016

Communication between office-based primary care providers and nurses working within patients' homes: an analysis of process data from CAPABLE.

Patrick D Smith, Cynthia Boyd, Julia Bellantoni, Jill Roth, Kathleen L Becker, Jessica Savage, Manka Nkimbeng, Sarah L Szanton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Pain Management in Home Health Care: Relationship With Dementia and Facility Admissions.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrick D SmithVillanova University College of Nursing, Villanova, PA, USA.
Cynthia BoydJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Julia BellantoniDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jill RothJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathleen L BeckerJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jessica SavageJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Manka NkimbengJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sarah L SzantonJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Research Infrastructure for the Hopkins Population CenterR24HD042854 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHERLIN, ANDREW J · 2003 to 2017
$5.1M
Reducing disability via a bundled bio-behavioral-environmental approachR01AG040100 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SZANTON, SARAH L · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040100NIA NIH HHS R01AG040100NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042854OMHHE CDC HHS 3U50MN00025-04S1OMHHE CDC HHS U50 MN000025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo examine themes of communication between office-based primary care providers and nurses working in private residences; to assess which methods of communication elicit fruitful responses to nurses' concerns.

backgroundLack of effective communication between home health care nurses and primary care providers contributes to clinical errors, inefficient care delivery and decreased patient safety. Few studies have described best practices related to frequency, methods and reasons for communication between community-based nurses and primary care providers.

designSecondary analysis of process data from 'Community Aging in Place: Advancing Better Living for Elders (CAPABLE)'.

methodsIndependent reviewers analysed nurse documentation of communication (phone calls, letters and client coaching) initiated for 70 patients and analysed 45 letters to primary care providers to identify common concerns and recommendations raised by CAPABLE nurses.

resultsPrimary care providers responded to 86% of phone calls, 56% of letters and 50% of client coaching efforts. Primary care providers addressed 86% of concerns communicated by phone, 34% of concerns communicated by letter and 41% of client-raised concerns. Nurses' letters addressed five key concerns: medication safety, pain, change in activities of daily living, fall safety and mental health. In letters, CAPABLE nurses recommended 58 interventions: medication change; referral to a specialist; patient education; and further diagnostic evaluation.

conclusionsEffective communication between home-based nurses and primary care providers enhances care coordination and improves outcomes for home-dwelling elders. Various methods of contact show promise for addressing specific communication needs. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses practicing within patients' homes can improve care coordination by using phone calls to address minor matters and written letters for detailed communication. Future research should explore implementation of Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation in home care to promote safe and efficient communication. Nurses should empower patients to address concerns directly with providers through use of devices including health passports.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCommunicationDelivery of Health CareNursing ProcessPatient Care TeamAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMalePrimary Health CareUnited Statescommunicationeldershome healthnursingprimary care

Identifiers

PMID26818370
PMCPMC4738578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.