Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26818215›Full record

Trial reportCancer biology & therapy2016

Comparison of hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide (TH-302) and ifosfamide in preclinical non-small cell lung cancer models.

Jessica D Sun, Qian Liu, Dharmendra Ahluwalia, Damien J Ferraro, Yan Wang, Don Jung, Mark D Matteucci, Charles P Hart

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer biology & therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. TH-302 (evofosfamide) monotherapy exerts anticancer activity in Ewing's sarcoma cells under hypoxia.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Pathways: Hypoxia-Activated Prodrugs in Cancer Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica D Suna Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Qian Liua Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Dharmendra Ahluwaliaa Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Damien J Ferraroa Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Yan Wanga Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Don Junga Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Mark D Matteuccia Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Charles P Harta Threshold Pharmaceuticals , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Threshold Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evofosfamide (TH-302) is a hypoxia-activated prodrug of the cytotoxin bromo-isophosphoramide. In hypoxic conditions Br-IPM is released and alkylates DNA. Ifosfamide is a chloro-isophosphoramide prodrug activated by hepatic Cytochrome P450 enzymes. Both compounds are used for the treatment of cancer. Ifosfamide has been approved by the FDA while evofosfamide is currently in the late stage of clinical development. The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety profile of evofosfamide and ifosfamide in preclinical non-small cell lung cancer H460 xenograft models. Immunocompetent CD-1 mice and H460 tumor-bearing immunocompromised nude mice were used to investigate the safety profile. The efficacy of evofosfamide or ifosfamide, alone, and in combination with docetaxel or sunitinib was compared in ectopic and intrapleural othortopic H460 xenograft models in animals exposed to ambient air or different oxygen concentration breathing conditions. At an equal body weight loss level, evofosfamide showed greater or comparable efficacy in both ectopic and orthotopic H460 xenograft models. Evofosfamide, but not ifosfamide, exhibited controlled oxygen concentration breathing condition-dependent antitumor activity. However, at an equal body weight loss level, ifosfamide yielded severe hematologic toxicity when compared to evofosfamide, both in monotherapy and in combination with docetaxel. At an equal hematoxicity level, evofosfamide showed superior antitumor activity. These results indicate that evofosfamide shows superior or comparable efficacy and a favorable safety profile when compared to ifosfamide in preclinical human lung carcinoma models. This finding is consistent with multiple clinical trials of evofosfamide as a single agent, or in combination therapy, which demonstrated both anti-tumor activity and safety profile without severe myelosuppression.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansIfosfamideLung NeoplasmsMiceNitroimidazolesPhosphoramide MustardsProdrugsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysIfosfamideNitroimidazolesPhosphoramide MustardsProdrugsTH 302Evofosfamidehypoxiahypoxia-activated prodrugifosfamidenon-small cell lung cancerxenograft

Identifiers

PMID26818215
PMCPMC5036787
OpenAlexW2325275602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.