Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26818079›Full record

ArticleRNA biology2016

What is an RNA? A top layer for RNA classification.

Jürgen Brosius, Carsten A Raabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jürgen Brosiusa Institute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster , Von-Esmarch-Str. 56, 48149 ; Münster , Germany.
Carsten A Raabea Institute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster , Von-Esmarch-Str. 56, 48149 ; Münster , Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every ribonucleic acid begins its cellular life as a transcript. If the transcript or its processing product has a function it should be regarded an RNA. Nonfunctional transcripts, by-products from processing, degradation intermediates, even those originating from (functional) RNAs, and non-functional products of transcriptional gene regulation accomplished via the act of transcription, as well as stochastic (co)transcripts could simply be addressed as transcripts (class 0). The copious functional RNAs (class I), often maturing after one or more processing steps, already are systematized into ever expanding sub-classifications ranging from micro RNAs to rRNAs. Established sub-classifications addressing a wide functional diversity remain unaffected. mRNAs (class II) are distinct from any other RNA by virtue of their potential to be translated into (poly)peptide(s) on ribosomes. We are not proposing a novel RNA classification, but wish to add a basic concept with existing terminology (transcript, RNA, and mRNA) that should serve as an additional framework for carefully delineating RNA function from an avalanche of RNA sequencing data. At the same time, this top level hierarchical model should illuminate important principles of RNA evolution and biology thus heightening our awareness that in biology boundaries and categorizations are typically fuzzy.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticGene Expression RegulationPeptidesRibosomesRNARNA, MessengerRNA, RibosomalRNA, UntranslatedPeptidesRNARNA, MessengerRNA, RibosomalRNA, UntranslatedBackground transcriptionfunctional RNAfuzzy boundariesmRNAspurious transcriptsthree superclasses

Identifiers

PMID26818079
PMCPMC4829331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.