Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26818021›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2016

Prostatic artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia in men ≥75 years: a prospective single-center study.

Mao Qiang Wang, Yan Wang, Jie Yu Yan, Kai Yuan, Guo Dong Zhang, Feng Duan, Kai Li

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mao Qiang WangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China. wangmq@vip.sina.com.
Yan WangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.
Jie Yu YanDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.
Kai YuanDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.
Guo Dong ZhangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.
Feng DuanDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.
Kai LiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the safety and efficacy of PAE for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men ≥75 years, who we defined as elderly, to those <75 years.

methodsA total of 157 patients diagnosed with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH underwent PAE. Group A (n = 52) included patients ≥75 years, and group B (n = 105) included patients <75 years. Follow-up was performed using the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), peak urinary flow rate (Q max), post-void residual volume (PVR), the International Index of Erectile Function short form (IIEF-5), prostatic-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate volume (PV), at 1, 3, 6, and every 6 months thereafter.

resultsMore coexistent systemic diseases were identified in group A than in group B (P < 0.05). Technical success rate of PAE was 90.4 % in group A and 95.2 % in group B (P = 0.06). A total of 147 patients had completed the follow-up with a mean of 20 months. Compared with the baseline, there were significant improvements in IPSS, QoL, Q max, PV, PVR, and PSA in both groups after PAE. There were no significant differences in the changes of IPSS, Q max, PVR, PSA, and IIEF-5 between groups after PAE. No major complications were noted.

conclusionPAE could be used as an effective, safe, and well tolerable method in the treatment of elderly symptomatic BPH patients, similarly to younger patients, and it may play an important role in patients in whom medical therapy has failed, who are at high surgical and anesthetic risk or who refuse the standard surgical therapy.

Indexed as

ArteriesEmbolization, TherapeuticAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstateProstatic HyperplasiaAging diseaseAngiographyBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)Prostatic artery embolization (PAE)

Identifiers

PMID26818021
OpenAlexW2264638165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.