Trial reportMedicine2016
A Randomized, Controlled Safety, and Immunogenicity Trial of the M72/AS01 Candidate Tuberculosis Vaccine in HIV-Positive Indian Adults.
Trial report in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01262976 (Safety and Immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' Candidate Tuberculosis Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' Candidate Tuberculosis Vaccine (692342) When Administered to HIV-positive Adults Living in a Tuberculosis Endemic Region
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of tuberculosis vaccine candidates in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Pooled it
- The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccines M72/AS01Frontiers in immunology · 2020Pooled it
- Immunogenicity and Safety of the M72/AS01Frontiers in immunology · 2019Pooled it
- Safety and immunogenicity of investigational tuberculosis vaccine M72/AS01The lancet. HIV · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Phase 2b Controlled Trial of M72/AS01The New England journal of medicine · 2018Trial
- Adjuvant-Associated Peripheral Blood mRNA Profiles and Kinetics Induced by the Adjuvanted Recombinant Protein Candidate Tuberculosis Vaccine M72/AS01 in Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Vaccinated Adults.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Trial
- Safety of the M72/AS01 Tuberculosis Vaccine in People Living With HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Advances in functional transcriptome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a review.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Review
- CD4 T cell phenotype after AS01-adjuvanted immunization is shaped by prior antigen or pathogen exposure.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Review
- Leaf Saponins ofPharmaceutics · 2025Review
- The delivery of new tuberculosis vaccines to people living with HIV - when to vaccinate?BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The PE/PPE family proteins ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Host Immune Response toJournal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- BCG and beyond: unlocking new frontiers in TB vaccine development.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Advancements in Nanoparticle-Based Adjuvants for Enhanced Tuberculosis Vaccination: A Review.Vaccines · 2024Review
- Advances in the development of new vaccines for tuberculosis and Brazil's role in the effort forward the end TB strategy.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2024Article
- Importance of adjuvant selection in tuberculosis vaccine development: Exploring basic mechanisms and clinical implications.Vaccine: X · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated tuberculosis is a major public health threat. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the candidate tuberculosis vaccine M72/AS01 in HIV-positive and HIV-negative Indian adults.Randomized, controlled observer-blind trial (NCT01262976).We assigned 240 adults (1:1:1) to antiretroviral therapy (ART)-stable, ART-naive, or HIV-negative cohorts. Cohorts were randomized 1:1 to receive M72/AS01 or placebo following a 0, 1-month schedule and followed for 12 months (time-point M13). HIV-specific and laboratory safety parameters, adverse events (AEs), and M72-specific T-cell-mediated and humoral responses were evaluated.Subjects were predominantly QuantiFERON-negative (60%) and Bacille Calmette-Guérin-vaccinated (73%). Seventy ART-stable, 73 ART-naive, and 60 HIV-negative subjects completed year 1. No vaccine-related serious AEs or ART-regimen adjustments, or clinically relevant effects on laboratory parameters, HIV-1 viral loads or CD4 counts were recorded. Two ART-naive vaccinees died of vaccine-unrelated diseases. M72/AS01 induced polyfunctional M72-specific CD4 T-cell responses (median [interquartile range] at 7 days postdose 2: ART-stable, 0.9% [0.7-1.5]; ART-naive, 0.5% [0.2-1.0]; and HIV-negative, 0.6% [0.4-1.1]), persisting at M13 (0.4% [0.2-0.5], 0.09% [0.04-0.2], and 0.1% [0.09-0.2], respectively). Median responses were higher in the ART-stable cohort versus ART-naive cohort from day 30 onwards (P ≤ 0.015). Among HIV-positive subjects (irrespective of ART-status), median responses were higher in QuantiFERON-positive versus QuantiFERON-negative subjects up to day 30 (P ≤ 0.040), but comparable thereafter. Cytokine-expression profiles were comparable between cohorts after dose 2. At M13, M72-specific IgG responses were higher in ART-stable and HIV-negative vaccinees versus ART-naive vaccinees (P ≤ 0.001).M72/AS01 was well-tolerated and immunogenic in this population of ART-stable and ART-naive HIV-positive adults and HIV-negative adults, supporting further clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.