Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26817773›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Effective number of breeders, effective population size and their relationship with census size in an iteroparous species, Salvelinus fontinalis.

Daniel E Ruzzante, Gregory R McCracken, Samantha Parmelee, Kristen Hill, Amelia Corrigan, John MacMillan, Sandra J Walde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing differences among elasmobranch nurseries to aid conservation based on a genomics framework.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Temporal Variability in Effective Size (Molecular ecology resources · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. TheEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel E RuzzanteDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H4R2 daniel.ruzzante@dal.ca.
Gregory R McCrackenDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H4R2.
Samantha ParmeleeDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H4R2.
Kristen HillDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H4R2.
Amelia CorriganInland Fisheries Division, Nova Scotia Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2R5.
John MacMillanInland Fisheries Division, Nova Scotia Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2R5.
Sandra J WaldeDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H4R2.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between the effective number of breeders (Nb) and the generational effective size (Ne) has rarely been examined empirically in species with overlapping generations and iteroparity. Based on a suite of 11 microsatellite markers, we examine the relationship between Nb, Ne and census population size (Nc) in 14 brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) populations inhabiting 12 small streams in Nova Scotia and sampled at least twice between 2009 and 2015. Unbiased estimates of Nb obtained with individuals of a single cohort, adjusted on the basis of age at first maturation (α) and adult lifespan (AL), were from 1.66 to 0.24 times the average estimates of Ne obtained with random samples of individuals of mixed ages (i.e. [Formula: see text]). In turn, these differences led to adjusted Ne estimates that were from nearly five to 0.7 times the estimates derived from mixed-aged individuals. These differences translate into the same range of variation in the ratio of effective to census population size [Formula: see text] within populations. Adopting [Formula: see text] as the more precise and unbiased estimates, we found that these brook trout populations differ markedly in their effective to census population sizes (range approx. 0.3 to approx. 0.01). Using AgeNe, we then showed that the variance in reproductive success or reproductive skew varied among populations by a factor of 40, from Vk/k ≈ 5 to 200. These results suggest wide differences in population dynamics, probably resulting from differences in productivity affecting the intensity of competition for access to mates or redds, and thus reproductive skew. Understanding the relationship between Ne, Nb and Nc, and how these relate to population dynamics and fluctuations in population size, are important for the design of robust conservation strategies in small populations with overlapping generations and iteroparity.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionAnimalsCanadaPopulation DensityReproductionTroutage at maturationbrook troutiteroparityNbNesmall populations

Identifiers

PMID26817773
PMCPMC4795031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.