Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26817768›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Multiple rod-cone and cone-rod photoreceptor transmutations in snakes: evidence from visual opsin gene expression.

Bruno F Simões, Filipa L Sampaio, Ellis R Loew, Kate L Sanders, Robert N Fisher, Nathan S Hart, David M Hunt, Julian C Partridge, David J Gower

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Bruno F SimõesDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK bruno.simoes@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-6541
Filipa L SampaioDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Ellis R LoewDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Kate L SandersSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.
Robert N FisherUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego, CA 92101, USA.
Nathan S HartDepartment of Biological Science, Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia.
David M HuntSchool of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia.
Julian C PartridgeSchool of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK.
David J GowerDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK d.gower@nhm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-8863
Natural History Museum · GBCornell University · USLions Eye Institute · AUMacquarie University · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUnited States Geological Survey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1934, Gordon Walls forwarded his radical theory of retinal photoreceptor 'transmutation'. This proposed that rods and cones used for scotopic and photopic vision, respectively, were not fixed but could evolve into each other via a series of morphologically distinguishable intermediates. Walls' prime evidence came from series of diurnal and nocturnal geckos and snakes that appeared to have pure-cone or pure-rod retinas (in forms that Walls believed evolved from ancestors with the reverse complement) or which possessed intermediate photoreceptor cells. Walls was limited in testing his theory because the precise identity of visual pigments present in photoreceptors was then unknown. Subsequent molecular research has hitherto neglected this topic but presents new opportunities. We identify three visual opsin genes, rh1, sws1 and lws, in retinal mRNA of an ecologically and taxonomically diverse sample of snakes central to Walls' theory. We conclude that photoreceptors with superficially rod- or cone-like morphology are not limited to containing scotopic or photopic opsins, respectively. Walls' theory is essentially correct, and more research is needed to identify the patterns, processes and functional implications of transmutation. Future research will help to clarify the fundamental properties and physiology of photoreceptors adapted to function in different light levels.

Indexed as

AnimalsCone OpsinsDNAGene Expression RegulationPhylogenyRetinaRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsRNA, MessengerRod OpsinsSnakesSpecies SpecificityCone OpsinsDNARNA, MessengerRod OpsinsmRNAretinaSerpentesvisionvisual pigments

Identifiers

PMID26817768
PMCPMC4795032
OpenAlexW2278468594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.