Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26817767›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Global patterns in threats to vertebrates by biological invasions.

C Bellard, P Genovesi, J M Jeschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Global ecological impacts of marine exotic species.Nature ecology & evolution · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Conservation priorities for functionally unique and specialized terrestrial vertebrates threatened by biological invasions.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Variations in Genetic Diversity of Invasive SpeciesAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Spatiotemporal and Individual Patterns of Domestic Cat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C BellardDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College of London, London, UK Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay 91400, France c.bellard@ucl.ac.uk.
P GenovesiInstitute for Environmental Protection and Research, and Chair of the IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, Rome, Italy.
J M JeschkeLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 310, Berlin 12587, Germany Department of Biology, Chemistry, Pharmacy, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Strasse 1-3, Berlin 14195, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions as drivers of biodiversity loss have recently been challenged. Fundamentally, we must know where species that are threatened by invasive alien species (IAS) live, and the degree to which they are threatened. We report the first study linking 1372 vertebrates threatened by more than 200 IAS from the completely revised Global Invasive Species Database. New maps of the vulnerability of threatened vertebrates to IAS permit assessments of whether IAS have a major influence on biodiversity, and if so, which taxonomic groups are threatened and where they are threatened. We found that centres of IAS-threatened vertebrates are concentrated in the Americas, India, Indonesia, Australia and New Zealand. The areas in which IAS-threatened species are located do not fully match the current hotspots of invasions, or the current hotspots of threatened species. The relative importance of biological invasions as drivers of biodiversity loss clearly varies across regions and taxa, and changes over time, with mammals from India, Indonesia, Australia and Europe are increasingly being threatened by IAS. The chytrid fungus primarily threatens amphibians, whereas invasive mammals primarily threaten other vertebrates. The differences in IAS threats between regions and taxa can help efficiently target IAS, which is essential for achieving the Strategic Plan 2020 of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringExtinction, BiologicalIntroduced SpeciesVertebratesAnimalsBiodiversityDatabases, FactualEndangered SpeciesInternationalityalien speciesbiological invasionsnon-native speciesthreatened speciesvertebrates

Identifiers

PMID26817767
PMCPMC4795027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.