Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26817641›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Decisions about the use of psychotropic medication during pregnancy: a qualitative study.

Fiona Stevenson, Sarah Hamilton, Vanessa Pinfold, Charlotte Walker, Ceri R J Dare, Harminder Kaur, Ruth Lambley, Paulina Szymczynska, Vicky Nicolls, Irene Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Perinatal mental health: a review of progress and challenges.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona StevensonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Sarah HamiltonMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Vanessa PinfoldMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Charlotte WalkerMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Ceri R J DareMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Harminder KaurMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Ruth LambleyMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Paulina SzymczynskaUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Vicky NicollsMental Health Foundation, London, UK.
Irene PetersenDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus, Denmark.
McPin Foundation · GBUniversity College London · GBMental Health Foundation · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/35/06Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand the perspectives of women with severe mental illness concerning the use of psychotropic medicines while pregnant.

designInterviews conducted by female peer researchers with personal experience of making or considering decisions about using psychotropic medicines in pregnancy, supported by professional researchers.

participants12 women who had had a baby in the past 5 years and had taken antipsychotics or mood-stabilisers for severe mental illness within the 12-month period immediately prior to that pregnancy. Recruitment to the study was via peer networks and the women interviewed came from different regions of England.

settingInterviews were arranged in places where women felt comfortable and that accommodated their childcare needs including their home, local library and the research office.

resultsThe views expressed demonstrated complex attempts to engage with decision-making about the use of psychotropic medicines in pregnancy. In nearly all cases, the women expressed the view that healthcare professionals had access to limited information leaving women to rely on experiential and common sense evidence when making decisions about medicine taking during pregnancy.

conclusionsThe findings complement existing work using electronic health records by providing explanations for the discontinuation of psychotropic medicines in pregnancy. Further work is necessary to understand health professionals' perspectives on the provision of services and care to women with severe mental illness during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeoplePrenatal CarePsychotropic DrugsPsychotropic DrugsDECISION MAKINGHEALTH EXPERIENCESMEDICINE TAKINGMENTAL HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID26817641
PMCPMC4735167
OpenAlexW2301246674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.