Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26817638›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Psychological interventions to improve psychological well-being in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Paul Farrand, Justin Matthews, Chris Dickens, Martin Anderson, Joanne Woodford

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04006756 (BrainFit), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04006756 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

BrainFit: The Effect of Online Cognitive Training in Patients With Late Life Mood Disorders.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2019 to 2021Enrolled38ConditionsDepression, Late Life Mood Disorder, Impaired Cognition, Alteration in MoodArmsOnline cognitive training 1, Online cognitive training 2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul FarrandClinical Education Development and Research (CEDAR) Group, Psychology: College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK Mental Health Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Justin MatthewsNIHR PenCLAHRC, Health Statistics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Chris DickensMental Health Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Martin AndersonClinical Education Development and Research (CEDAR) Group, Psychology: College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Joanne WoodfordClinical Education Development and Research (CEDAR) Group, Psychology: College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDementia and mild cognitive impairment are associated with an increased risk of depression, anxiety, psychological distress and poor mental health-related quality of life. However, there is a lack of research examining the evidence base for psychological interventions targeting general psychological well-being within this population. Furthermore, there is little research relating to the design of randomised controlled trials examining psychological interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment, such as effective recruitment techniques, trial eligibility and appropriate comparators. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic review of electronic databases (CINAHL; EMBASE; PsychInfo; MEDLINE; ASSIA and CENTRAL), supplemented by expert contact, reference and citation checking, and grey literature searches. Published and unpublished studies will be eligible for inclusion with no limitations placed on year of publication. Primary outcomes of interest will be standardised measurements of depression, anxiety, psychological distress or mental health-related quality of life. Eligibility and randomisation proportions will be calculated as secondary outcomes. If data permits, meta-analytical techniques will examine: (1) overall effectiveness of psychological interventions for people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment in relation to outcomes of depression, anxiety, psychological distress or mental health-related quality of life; (2) clinical and methodological moderators associated with effectiveness; (3) proportions eligible, recruited and randomised. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for the present systematic review. Results will inform the design of a feasibility study examining a new psychological intervention for people with dementia and depression, with dissemination through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015025177.

Indexed as

AnxietyClinical ProtocolsCognitive DysfunctionDementiaDepressionHumansMental HealthMeta-Analysis as TopicPsychotherapyQuality of LifeSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26817638
PMCPMC4735211
OpenAlexW2275691685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.