Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26817630›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2016

Decolonization in Prevention of Health Care-Associated Infections.

Edward J Septimus, Marin L Schweizer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04431934 (Open-label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy of a Probiotic or Fecal Microbiota Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04431934 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Open-label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy of a Probiotic or Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) on the Eradication of Rectal Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli (MDR-GNB) Carriage (PROFTMDECOL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled437ConditionsCARRIER STATEArmsPROBIOTIC, FMT REGIMEN
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 252 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mupirocin-resistantAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Comparison of global decolonization efficacy with mupirocin nasal drop and chlorhexidine mouthwash in acute leukemia patients: randomized clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing of adult patients in intensive care units in São Paulo, Brazil: Impact on the incidence of healthcare-associated infection.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edward J SeptimusHospital Corporation of America, Nashville, Tennessee, USA Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA Edward.septimus@hcahealthcare.com.
Marin L SchweizerUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Iowa City VA Health Care System · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonization with health care-associated pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci, Gram-negative organisms, and Clostridium difficile is associated with increased risk of infection. Decolonization is an evidence-based intervention that can be used to prevent health care-associated infections (HAIs). This review evaluates agents used for nasal topical decolonization, topical (e.g., skin) decolonization, oral decolonization, and selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination. Although the majority of studies performed to date have focused on S. aureus decolonization, there is increasing interest in how to apply decolonization strategies to reduce infections due to Gram-negative organisms, especially those that are multidrug resistant. Nasal topical decolonization agents reviewed include mupirocin, bacitracin, retapamulin, povidone-iodine, alcohol-based nasal antiseptic, tea tree oil, photodynamic therapy, omiganan pentahydrochloride, and lysostaphin. Mupirocin is still the gold standard agent for S. aureus nasal decolonization, but there is concern about mupirocin resistance, and alternative agents are needed. Of the other nasal decolonization agents, large clinical trials are still needed to evaluate the effectiveness of retapamulin, povidone-iodine, alcohol-based nasal antiseptic, tea tree oil, omiganan pentahydrochloride, and lysostaphin. Given inferior outcomes and increased risk of allergic dermatitis, the use of bacitracin-containing compounds cannot be recommended as a decolonization strategy. Topical decolonization agents reviewed included chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), hexachlorophane, povidone-iodine, triclosan, and sodium hypochlorite. Of these, CHG is the skin decolonization agent that has the strongest evidence base, and sodium hypochlorite can also be recommended. CHG is associated with prevention of infections due to Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms as well as Candida. Conversely, triclosan use is discouraged, and topical decolonization with hexachlorophane and povidone-iodine cannot be recommended at this time. There is also evidence to support use of selective digestive decontamination and selective oropharyngeal decontamination, but additional studies are needed to assess resistance to these agents, especially selection for resistance among Gram-negative organisms. The strongest evidence for decolonization is for use among surgical patients as a strategy to prevent surgical site infections.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCross InfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialFungiGastrointestinal TractHumansNoseSkinAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26817630
PMCPMC4786886
OpenAlexW2304717955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.