Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26817490›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2016

Evaluation of Biomarkers of Exposure in Smokers Switching to a Carbon-Heated Tobacco Product: A Controlled, Randomized, Open-Label 5-Day Exposure Study.

Frank Lüdicke, Christelle Haziza, Rolf Weitkunat, John Magnette

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00812279 (A Controlled, Randomised, Open-label, 3-arm Parallel Single-centre Confinement Study to Investigate Exposure to Selected Smoke Constituents in Smokers Switching From Conventional Cigarettes to SMAR Cigarettes for 5 Days), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00812279 nacompletednot on this map

A Controlled, Randomised, Open-label, 3-arm Parallel Single-centre Confinement Study to Investigate Exposure to Selected Smoke Constituents in Smokers Switching From Conventional Cigarettes to SMAR Cigarettes for 5 Days

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilip Morris Products S.A.Ran2008 to 2009Enrolled112ConditionsSmokingArmsDistillation based smoking article (SMAR cigarette), conventional cigarette, smoking cessation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exposure to Heated Tobacco Products and Adverse Health Effects, a Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank LüdickeDepartment of Research and Development, Philip Morris Products S.A., Neuchâtel, Switzerland frank.luedicke@pmi.com.
Christelle HazizaDepartment of Research and Development, Philip Morris Products S.A., Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Rolf WeitkunatDepartment of Research and Development, Philip Morris Products S.A., Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
John MagnetteDepartment of Research and Development, Philip Morris Products S.A., Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Philip Morris International (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTobacco harm reduction aims to provide reduced risk alternatives to adult smokers who would otherwise continue smoking combustible cigarettes (CCs). This randomized, open-label, three-arm, parallel-group, single-center, short-term confinement study aimed to investigate the effects of exposure to selected harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) of cigarette smoke in adult smokers who switched to a carbon-heated tobacco product (CHTP) compared with adult smokers who continued to smoke CCs and those who abstained from smoking for 5 days.

methodsBiomarkers of exposure to HPHCs, including nicotine and urinary excretion of mutagenic material, were measured in 24-hour urine and blood samples in 112 male and female Caucasian smokers switching from CCs to the CHTP ad libitum use. Puffing topography was assessed during product use.

resultsSwitching to the CHTP or smoking abstinence (SA) resulted in marked decreases from baseline to Day 5 in all biomarkers of exposure measured, including carboxyhemoglobin (43% and 55% decrease in the CHTP and SA groups, respectively). The urinary excretion of mutagenic material was also markedly decreased on Day 5 compared with baseline (89% and 87% decrease in the CHTP and SA groups, respectively). No changes in biomarkers of exposure to HPHCs or urinary mutagenic material were observed between baseline and Day 5 in the CC group.

conclusionsOur results provide clear evidence supporting a reduction in the level of exposure to HPHCs of tobacco smoke in smokers who switch to CHTP under controlled conditions, similar to that observed in SA. IMPLICATIONS: The reductions observed in biomarkers of exposure to HPHCs of tobacco smoke in this short-term study could potentially also reduce the incidence of cancer, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases in those smokers who switch to a heated tobacco product.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersCarboxyhemoglobinElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHarm ReductionHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotinePolandSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBiomarkersCarboxyhemoglobinNicotine

Identifiers

PMID26817490
PMCPMC4902889
OpenAlexW2274460868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.