Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26817459›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

CP-CHARM: segmentation-free image classification made accessible.

Virginie Uhlmann, Shantanu Singh, Anne E Carpenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Machine learning and image-based profiling in drug discovery.Current opinion in systems biology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Sharing and reusing cell image data.Molecular biology of the cell · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Pharmacognosy magazine · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Virginie UhlmannBiomedical Imaging Group, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. virginie.uhlmann@epfl.ch.
Shantanu SinghImaging Platform, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. shsingh@broadinstitute.org.
Anne E CarpenterImaging Platform, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. anne@broadinstitute.org.

Funding

Continued Development of CellProfiler Cell Image Analysis SoftwareR01GM089652 · NIGMS · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARPENTER, ANNE E. · 2010 to 2016
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089652PHS HHS R01089652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomated classification using machine learning often relies on features derived from segmenting individual objects, which can be difficult to automate. WND-CHARM is a previously developed classification algorithm in which features are computed on the whole image, thereby avoiding the need for segmentation. The algorithm obtained encouraging results but requires considerable computational expertise to execute. Furthermore, some benchmark sets have been shown to be subject to confounding artifacts that overestimate classification accuracy.

resultsWe developed CP-CHARM, a user-friendly image-based classification algorithm inspired by WND-CHARM in (i) its ability to capture a wide variety of morphological aspects of the image, and (ii) the absence of requirement for segmentation. In order to make such an image-based classification method easily accessible to the biological research community, CP-CHARM relies on the widely-used open-source image analysis software CellProfiler for feature extraction. To validate our method, we reproduced WND-CHARM's results and ensured that CP-CHARM obtained comparable performance. We then successfully applied our approach on cell-based assay data and on tissue images. We designed these new training and test sets to reduce the effect of batch-related artifacts.

conclusionsThe proposed method preserves the strengths of WND-CHARM - it extracts a wide variety of morphological features directly on whole images thereby avoiding the need for cell segmentation, but additionally, it makes the methods easily accessible for researchers without computational expertise by implementing them as a CellProfiler pipeline. It has been demonstrated to perform well on a wide range of bioimage classification problems, including on new datasets that have been carefully selected and annotated to minimize batch effects. This provides for the first time a realistic and reliable assessment of the whole image classification strategy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsCellsComputational BiologyHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, FluorescencePattern Recognition, AutomatedSoftware

Identifiers

PMID26817459
PMCPMC4729047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.