Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26816864›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2015

Review of intravesical therapies for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis.

Kristina Cvach, Anna Rosamilia

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03463915 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Bladder Instillation Treatments for Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorOlivia Cardenas-Trowers, M.D.Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled90ConditionsInterstitial Cystitis, Bladder Pain SyndromeArmsBladder instillation WITH triamcinolone acetonide, Bladder instillation WITHOUT triamcinolone acetonide
NCT04401176 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Trial of Bladder Instillations Versus Onabotulinumtoxin A for Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorWalter Reed National Military Medical CenterRan2020 to 2023Enrolled58ConditionsInterstitial Cystitis, Bladder Pain SyndromeArmsHeparin & Alkalinized Lidocaine Bladder Instillation, Onabotulinum Toxin A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Synergy of Hydeal-DPharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristina Cvach1 Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia ; 2 Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Anna Rosamilia1 Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia ; 2 Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Mercy Hospital for Women · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is a chronic pain condition characterised by urinary frequency, urgency and pain or discomfort which the patient attributes to the bladder. It is a complex condition to manage and treat and requires a multi-disciplinary and multi-modal approach. As well as lifestyle and behavioural modifications, physical therapy and oral medications, intravesical treatments can be used in the treatment algorithm for BPS/IC. A number of intravesical agents are reviewed in this paper along with the available evidence for their use.

Indexed as

Bladder pain syndrome (BPS)instillation therapyinterstitial cystitis (IC)intravesical therapy

Identifiers

PMID26816864
PMCPMC4708535
OpenAlexW2192566144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.