Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26816854›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2015

Angiogenic factors, bladder neuroplasticity and interstitial cystitis-new pathobiological insights.

Ricardo Saban

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Biomarkers in the Light of the Etiopathology of IC/BPS.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ricardo Saban1 University Anhembi Morumbi, S.Paulo, SP 03164-000, Brazil ; 2 Department of Physiology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Anhembi Morumbi University · BR

Funding

Bladder transcriptome in experimental inflammationR56DK066101 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI SABAN, RICARDO · 2009 to 2009
$355k
NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK066101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is essential for normal embryonic development, and maintenance of adult vascular function. Originally described as a vascular permeability factor, VEGF alters tight cell junctions and contributes to maintenance of bladder permeability. VEGF and its receptors are not only expressed in bladder blood vessels but also in apical cells and intramural ganglia. VEGF receptors are fundamentally altered by inflammation and bladder diseases such as interstitial cystitis (IC). Experimental results indicate that VEGF exerts direct effects on bladder nerve density and function. Regardless of the etiology or initiating cause for IC, it is hypothesized that the urinary bladder responds to injury by increasing the production of VEGF that acts initially as a survival mechanism. However, VEGF also has the capacity to increase vascular permeability leading to glomerulations, edema, and inflammation. Moreover, due to elevated numbers of VEGF receptors in the urothelium, the increased levels of VEGF further increase bladder permeability and establish a vicioCus cycle of disease pathophysiology.

Indexed as

hormonesNeuropilins (NRPs)neuroplasticitypregnancysoluble VEGF receptorsvascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)

Identifiers

PMID26816854
PMCPMC4708555
OpenAlexW1870302644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.