Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26816503›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2015

Attitude and practice of brachytherapy in India: a study based on the survey amongst attendees of Annual Meeting of Indian Brachytherapy Society.

Ajeet Kumar Gandhi, Daya Nand Sharma, Pramod Kumar Julka, Goura Kishor Rath

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07290972 (Compliance to Cervical Cancer Chemoradiation Guidelines), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07290972 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Compliance to Cervical Cancer Chemoradiation Guidelines: A Implementation Audit and Resource Assessment Initiative of National Cancer Grid of India

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorTata Memorial HospitalRan2021 to 2026Enrolled618ConditionsCervical Cancer Screening, Gynecologic Cancers, Treatment Compliance, ChemoradiotherapyArmsNot applicable- observational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ajeet Kumar GandhiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Daya Nand SharmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Pramod Kumar JulkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Goura Kishor RathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe performed a survey amongst attendees of the 4(th) Annual Meeting of Indian Brachytherapy Society to study the patterns of brachytherapy practice and attitude towards brachytherapy use. MATERIAL AND

methodsA 19-point questionnaire was designed and e-mailed to the attendees immediately after the conference. Descriptive analysis of the responses were done and satisfaction index was used as a tool for evaluation of the program effectiveness. Binomial test was used to assess the difference between distributions of responses and Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the correlation between responses. P value (2-tailed) of < 0.05 was taken significant for all statistical analysis.

resultsOf a total of 202 attendees, 90 responded to the survey (response rate: 44.5%). Seventy-two percent belonged to an academic institute while 28% belonged to non-academic institutes. Eighty-six percent were radiation oncologists and 10% were medical physicists. Eighty-nine percent respondents used high-dose-rate, 14% - pulse-dose-rate, and 13% used low-dose-rate brachytherapy facility. Orthogonal X-rays, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging was used for brachytherapy planning by 56%, 69%, and 14%, respectively. Ninety-three percent of them thought that lack of training is a hurdle in practicing brachytherapy and 92% opined that brachytherapy dedicated meetings can change their perception about brachytherapy. Seventy percent respondents admitted to make some changes in their practice patterns after attending this meeting. Ninety-seven percent of them would like to attend future meetings and 98% felt the need to include live workshops, hands on demonstrations, and video presentations in the scientific programme.

conclusionsThe survey highlights a positive attitude towards increasing brachytherapy use, and may serve as an important guiding tool in designing teaching and training programmes; thus overcoming the hurdles in successful and widespread use of a quality brachytherapy programme at radiotherapy centers.

Indexed as

brachytherapyconferenceIndiasurvey

Identifiers

PMID26816503
PMCPMC4716124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.