ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry
Consultation-liaison psychiatry services: Difference in the patient profile while following different service models in the medical emergency.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of Psychiatric Referrals in a Consultation-Liaison Setting at a Rural Tertiary Care Center in Central India.Cureus · 2025Article
- Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Elderly Presenting with Psychiatric Emergencies.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Basics for Physicians and Psychiatrists for Effective Practice of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Services.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2022Article
- Profile of patients availing psychiatry emergency services pre and post lockdown at a tertiary care center of North India.Asian journal of psychiatry · 2020Article
- New consultation liaison model of providing care to COVID patients.Asian journal of psychiatry · 2020Article
- Profile of Patients Seen in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry in India: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2020Article
- Bridging the emergency psychiatry and telepsychiatry care: Will COVID-19 lead to evolution of another model?Asian journal of psychiatry · 2020Article
- Clinical outcome and predictors of adverse events of an enhanced older adult psychiatric liaison service: Rapid Assessment Interface and Discharge (Newport).Clinical interventions in aging · 2017Article
- Consultation-liaison psychiatric service utilization by suicide attempters.Indian journal of psychiatryArticle
- Pattern of Inpatient Consultation-liaison Psychiatry Utility in a Tertiary Care Hospital.International journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
- Reasons for referral and diagnostic concordance between physicians/surgeons and the consultation-liaison psychiatry team: An exploratory study from a tertiary care hospital in India.Indian journal of psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare "consultation" and "hybrid" models of consultation-liaison (CL) services provided to patients visiting the medical emergency outpatient services. MATERIALS AND
methodsOver the period of 18 months, two different models of consultation psychiatry services (July 2012 to March 2013-consultation model, April 2013 to December 2013 hybrid model) were compared. In the consultation model, the psychiatry resident was available on call to the internists. Whereas, for the hybrid model psychiatry resident was stationed in the medical emergency and was available to assess the patients directly requiring psychiatric evaluation.
resultsDuring the first 9 months, 22,000 patients were evaluated in various emergency medical outpatient services, of which 383 (1.74%) were referred to the on-call psychiatry CL team. However, when the hybrid model was followed, the number of patients evaluated by the psychiatry resident increased to 594 out of 24,737 patients (2.4%) who reported to the emergency during the next 9 months period. There was a substantial increase in the proportion of cases with medical illnesses for which psychiatric consultation was sought, and a change in psychiatric diagnostic profile was observed too. When compared to the consultation model, the hybrid model was associated with greater use of medications, investigations, referrals and psychological measures in the emergency setting itself.
conclusionsFollowing a hybrid model in the medical emergency leads to an increase in the number of total psychiatric consultations and more extensive management of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.