Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26815984›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2016

A Challenge between Trainee Education and Patient Safety: Does Fellow Participation Impact Postoperative Outcomes Following Bariatric Surgery?

Ali Aminian, Rizwan M Chaudhry, Zhamak Khorgami, Amin Andalib, Toms Augustin, John Rodriguez, Matthew Kroh, Philip R Schauer, Stacy A Brethauer

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Complications and Readmissions Associated with First Assistant Training Level Following Elective Bariatric Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali AminianBariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. aminiaa@ccf.org.
Rizwan M ChaudhryBariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Zhamak KhorgamiBariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Amin AndalibBariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Toms AugustinBariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
John RodriguezBariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Matthew KrohBariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Philip R SchauerBariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Stacy A BrethauerBariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical training may potentially influence patient care. A safe, high-quality bariatric and metabolic surgery practice requires dedicated and specialized training commonly acquired during a fellowship. This study evaluates the impact of fellow participation on early postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery.

methodsFrom the American College of Surgeons (ACS-NSQIP) database, we identified all obese patients who had undergone primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between 2010 and 2012. Logistic regression was used to prognosticate the surgical fellow (PGY-6, 7, or 8) participation in bariatric surgeries on perioperative outcomes, as compared to surgeries with no trainee participation.

resultsThe study cohort consisted of 10,838 patients (8819 LRYGB, 2019 LSG, 32 % fellow participation). Fellows participated in higher-risk surgeries. Fellow involvement was associated with increased operative time in LRYGB (difference 42.4 ± 1.2 min, p < 0.001) and in LSG (difference 38.8 ± 2.5 min, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression revealed that fellow involvement in LSG did not significantly alter postoperative adverse events. Conversely, in the LRYGB group, fellow participation was independently associated with higher rates of overall complications (OR = 1.37, 95 % CI 1.16-1.63), serious complications (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI 1.00-1.52), surgical complications (OR = 1.42; 95 % CI 1.17-1.73), and reoperation (OR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.10-1.87). On adjusted analysis, while readmission was higher with fellow involvement in both procedures, mortality rates were comparable.

conclusionsFellow involvement resulted in a clinically appreciable increase in operative times. Fellow participation in the operating room was also independently associated with worse early postoperative outcomes following LRYGB, but was not the case for LSG. Promoting proficiency in surgical simulation laboratories and a gradual participation of fellows from LSG to LRYGB during fellowship may be associated with a reduction in postoperative complications.

Indexed as

Fellowships and ScholarshipsPatient SafetyAdultBariatric SurgeryBenchmarkingDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsUnited StatesBariatric surgeryFellowFellowshipGastric bypassNSQIPSleeve gastrectomyTrainee

Identifiers

PMID26815984
OpenAlexW2298615928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.