Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26815916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Access to Treatment for Diabetes and Hypertension in Rural Cambodia: Performance of Existing Social Health Protection Schemes.

Maryam Bigdeli, Bart Jacobs, Chean Rithy Men, Kristine Nilsen, Wim Van Damme, Bruno Dujardin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Flipped Break-Even: Re-Balancing Demand- and Supply-Side Financing of Health Centers in Cambodia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Maryam BigdeliAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bart JacobsDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chean Rithy MenChean and Jaco consulting company, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Kristine NilsenDepartment of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Wim Van DammeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bruno DujardinCentre de Recherches en Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Santé Internationale, School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research · CHDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit · PHInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-communicable diseases (NCD) pose challenges to Cambodia's health system. Medicines for NCD are on the National Essential Medicines List but no clinical guidelines support their utilization. Two social health protection schemes aimed at the informal sector population exist (Health Equity Funds and Insurance) together with two disease-specific interventions (a Peer Educator Network and Chronic Diseases Clinics) targeted at NCD patients. This study examines performance of these various schemes in relation to NCD.

methodsCross-sectional household survey among 709 individuals self-reporting diabetes and/or hypertension in three geographical locations in rural Cambodia using a structured questionnaire investigating diagnostic and treatment pathways, health seeking behaviour, health expenditures, and financial coping mechanisms.

resultsTwo third of respondents with NCD were female and 55% did not belong to any scheme. The majority (59%) were diagnosed in the private sector and only 56% were on allopathic treatment that was mainly sought in the private sector (49%). Outpatient treatment cost was higher in the private sector and when using multiple providers of care. The majority were indebted, 11% due to health-related expenses. Contrary to social health protection schemes, disease-specific interventions offered better access to allopathic treatment and provided medicines in accordance with NEML.

conclusionThe benefit packages of existing social health protection schemes and services in the public health sector should be adjusted to cater for the needs of people living with NCD in rural Cambodia. Initiatives that offer active disease management strategies and promote patients and community participation appear more successful in increasing treatment adherence and decreasing the risk of financial hardship.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCambodiaCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth ExpendituresHealth Services AccessibilityHumansHypertensionHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPublic HealthAntihypertensive AgentsHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26815916
PMCPMC4729435
OpenAlexW2292885069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.