Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26815908›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Treatment of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy -a cross-sectional study among 712 Norwegian women.

Kristine Heitmann, Anja Solheimsnes, Gro C Havnen, Hedvig Nordeng, Lone Holst

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06055192 (Prevalence and Burden of Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnant Women in Switzerland), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06055192 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prevalence and Burden of Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnant Women in Switzerland: Survey Purity 2022

TypeobservationalSponsorEffik SARan2023 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsNausea, Vomiting of PregnancyArmsSurvey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristine HeitmannDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P-Box 7804, N-5018, Bergen, Norway. kristine.heitmann@igs.uib.no.
Anja SolheimsnesDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P-Box 7804, N-5018, Bergen, Norway.
Gro C HavnenRegional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hedvig NordengPharmacoEpidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lone HolstDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P-Box 7804, N-5018, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purposes of this study were to investigate the treatments used for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) according to NVP severity among Norwegian women and to assess whether maternal characteristics and attitudes were related to the use of pharmacological treatment of NVP.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional Web-based study. Pregnant women and mothers with children ≤1 year of age were eligible to participate. Data were collected through an anonymous online questionnaire accessible from November 10th, 2014 to January 31st, 2015.

resultsIn total, 712 women were included in the study, of which 62 (8.7 %), 439 (61.7 %) and 210 (29.5 %) had mild, moderate and severe NVP, respectively, according to the Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis (PUQE) classification. A total of 277 (38.9 %) women had used one or more antiemetics, of which meclizine, closely followed by metoclopramide, was the most commonly used. Different drug utilisation patterns were found between the groups of women with mild, moderate and severe NVP. Many with moderate or severe symptoms did not use any pharmacological treatment (70.2 and 32.9 %, respectively). Sick leave was given without initiating medical treatment in 266 (62.1 %) women. The women's beliefs about medicines had an important impact on their use of medicines for NVP.

conclusionsA large proportion of women suffered from moderate to severe symptoms of NVP, many of whom did not receive any pharmacological treatment. Many women, who had been on sick leave due to NVP, were not prescribed medicines.

Indexed as

AdultAntiemeticsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansNauseaNorwayPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesVomitingAntiemeticsDrug therapyHyperemesis gravidarumMeclizineMetoclopramideMorning sicknessPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26815908
OpenAlexW2299309421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.