Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26815901›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2014

Mortality after proximal femur fracture with a delay of surgery of more than 48 h.

M Muhm, D Klein, C Weiss, T Ruffing, H Winkler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Factors Associated With Early Functional Outcome After Hip Fracture Surgery.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M MuhmDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Westpfalz-Klinikum Kaiserslautern, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Hellmut-Hartert-Str. 1, 67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany. mmuhm@westpfalz-klinikum.de.
D KleinDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Westpfalz-Klinikum Kaiserslautern, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Hellmut-Hartert-Str. 1, 67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
C WeissDepartment of Medical Statistics, Biomathematics and Information Processing, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
T RuffingDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Westpfalz-Klinikum Kaiserslautern, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Hellmut-Hartert-Str. 1, 67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
H WinklerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Westpfalz-Klinikum Kaiserslautern, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Hellmut-Hartert-Str. 1, 67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor hip fractures, guidelines require surgery as soon as possible, but not later than 48 h. Some authors observed a positive and some a negative effect of early operation on mortality rate. The aim was to evaluate the mortality rate of patients with a delay of surgery >48 h after admission, as well as influencing factors and reasons for delay.

methodsOne hundred and thirty-six patients with hip fractures (>65a) from 2007 to 2011 were included. Comorbidities, the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification, time of admission and surgery, and mortality were recorded up to 12 months. Reasons for delay were divided into administrative-related or patient-related. The following time intervals were observed: 48.01-72 h (2-3 days), 72.01-120 h (3-5 days), 120.01-168 h (5-7 days), 168 h (>7 days).

results94.9 % of the reasons for delay were patient-related. The mean survival times of the first three intervals were almost the same (9.5-9.9 months) (p = 0.75). The last group had a significantly shorter survival time (7.8 months). Summarizing the first three groups, a significant shorter (p = 0.03) survival time and significantly higher (p = 0.04) 12-month mortality rate in patients with a delay >7 days was observed. The probability of death was primarily dependent on the ASA classification (p < 0.0001) and secondarily on the patient's age at the time of injury (p = 0.005).

conclusionsIn hip fractures, reasons for a delay >48 h are mainly patient-related. A delay up to 7 days did not influence survival time and mortality negatively. The higher the value of the ASA classification and the older the patient was at the time of injury, the higher the mortality rate and the shorter the survival time.

Indexed as

Delay of surgeryFemur fractureHip fracturesSurvival time

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.